This page describes how to integrate with C++ rules on various levels.
Because of ongoing migration of C++ rules to platforms and toolchains, we advise to use the helper function available at @bazel_tools//tools/cpp:toolchain_utils.bzl, which works both when toolchains are disabled and enabled. To depend on a C++ toolchain in your rule, add a Label
attribute named _cc_toolchain
and point it to @bazel_tools//tools/cpp:current_cc_toolchain
(an instance of cc_toolchain_alias
rule, that points to the currently selected C++ toolchain). Then, in the rule implementation, use find_cpp_toolchain(ctx)
to get the CcToolchainInfo
. A complete working example can be found in the rules_cc examples.
Typically, you would integrate with the C++ toolchain to have the same command line flags as C++ rules do, but without using C++ actions directly. This is because when writing our own actions, they must behave consistently with the C++ toolchain - for example, passing C++ command line flags to a tool that invokes the C++ compiler behind the scenes.
C++ rules use a special way of constructing command lines based on feature configuration. To construct a command line, you need the following:
features
and action_configs
- these come from the CcToolchainConfigInfo
and encapsulated in CcToolchainInfo
FeatureConfiguration
- returned by cc_common.configure_featuresThere still are tool-specific getters, such as compiler_executable. Prefer get_tool_for_action
over these, as tool-specific getters will eventually be removed.
A complete working example can be found in the rules_cc examples.
Most C++ rules provide CcInfo
, a provider containing CompilationContext
and LinkingContext
. Through these it is possible to access information such as all transitive headers or libraries to link. From CcInfo
and from the CcToolchainInfo
custom Starlark rules should be able to get all the information they need.
If a custom Starlark rule provides CcInfo
, it‘s a signal to the C++ rules that they can also depend on it. Be careful, however - if you only need to propagate CcInfo
through the graph to the binary rule that then makes use of it, wrap CcInfo
in a different provider. For example, if java_library
rule wanted to propagate native dependencies up to the java_binary
, it shouldn’t provide CcInfo
directly (cc_binary
depending on java_library
doesn't make sense), it should wrap it in, for example, JavaCcInfo
.
A complete working example can be found in the rules_cc examples.
Not stable yet, we will update this section once the API stabilizes. Follow #4570 for up to date information.