diff --git a/src/test/java/BUILD b/src/test/java/BUILD
index d118130..9d73138 100644
--- a/src/test/java/BUILD
+++ b/src/test/java/BUILD
@@ -748,6 +748,31 @@
 )
 
 java_test(
+    name = "runtime-tests",
+    srcs = glob(["com/google/devtools/build/lib/runtime/*.java"]),
+    args = ["com.google.devtools.build.lib.AllTests"],
+    deps = [
+        ":foundations_testutil",
+        ":test_runner",
+        ":testutil",
+        "//src/main/java:analysis-exec-rules-skyframe",
+        "//src/main/java:buildtool-runtime",
+        "//src/main/java:clock",
+        "//src/main/java:io",
+        "//src/main/java:options",
+        "//src/main/java:packages",
+        "//src/main/java:util",
+        "//src/main/java:vfs",
+        "//src/main/protobuf:invocation_policy_proto",
+        "//src/main/protobuf:test_status_proto",
+        "//third_party:guava",
+        "//third_party:junit4",
+        "//third_party:mockito",
+        "//third_party:truth",
+    ],
+)
+
+java_test(
     name = "sandbox-tests",
     srcs = glob(["com/google/devtools/build/lib/sandbox/*.java"]),
     args = ["com.google.devtools.build.lib.AllTests"],
diff --git a/src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/runtime/AbstractCommandTest.java b/src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/runtime/AbstractCommandTest.java
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7abb490
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/runtime/AbstractCommandTest.java
@@ -0,0 +1,118 @@
+// Copyright 2015 The Bazel Authors. All rights reserved.
+//
+// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
+// you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
+// You may obtain a copy of the License at
+//
+//    http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+//
+// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+// limitations under the License.
+package com.google.devtools.build.lib.runtime;
+
+import com.google.common.collect.ImmutableList;
+import com.google.devtools.build.lib.analysis.ConfiguredRuleClassProvider;
+import com.google.devtools.build.lib.testutil.MoreAsserts;
+import com.google.devtools.build.lib.util.ExitCode;
+import com.google.devtools.common.options.Option;
+import com.google.devtools.common.options.OptionsBase;
+import com.google.devtools.common.options.OptionsParser;
+import com.google.devtools.common.options.OptionsProvider;
+import org.junit.Test;
+import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
+import org.junit.runners.JUnit4;
+
+import java.util.ArrayList;
+import java.util.Collection;
+import java.util.Collections;
+import java.util.List;
+
+import static org.junit.Assert.assertEquals;
+
+/**
+ * Tests {@link BlazeCommand}.
+ */
+@RunWith(JUnit4.class)
+public class AbstractCommandTest {
+
+  public static class FooOptions extends OptionsBase {
+    @Option(name = "foo", category = "one", defaultValue = "0")
+    public int foo;
+  }
+
+  public static class BarOptions extends OptionsBase {
+    @Option(name = "bar", category = "two", defaultValue = "42")
+    public int foo;
+
+    @Option(name = "baz", category = "one", defaultValue = "oops")
+    public String baz;
+  }
+
+  private static class ConcreteCommand implements BlazeCommand {
+    @Override
+    public ExitCode exec(CommandEnvironment env, OptionsProvider options) {
+      throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
+    }
+
+    @Override
+    public void editOptions(CommandEnvironment env, OptionsParser optionsParser) {}
+  }
+
+  @Command(name = "test_name",
+          help = "Usage: some funny usage for %{command} ...;\n\n%{options}; end",
+          options = {FooOptions.class, BarOptions.class},
+          shortDescription = "a short description",
+          allowResidue = false)
+  private static class TestCommand extends ConcreteCommand {}
+
+  @Test
+  public void testGetNameYieldsAnnotatedName() {
+    assertEquals("test_name",
+        new TestCommand().getClass().getAnnotation(Command.class).name());
+  }
+
+  @Test
+  public void testGetOptionsYieldsAnnotatedOptions() {
+    ConfiguredRuleClassProvider ruleClassProvider = new ConfiguredRuleClassProvider.Builder()
+        .build();
+
+    MoreAsserts.assertSameContents(optionClassesWithDefault(FooOptions.class, BarOptions.class),
+        BlazeCommandUtils.getOptions(
+            TestCommand.class, ImmutableList.<BlazeModule>of(), ruleClassProvider));
+  }
+
+  /***************************************************************************
+   * The tests below test how a command interacts with the dispatcher except *
+   * for execution, which is tested in {@link BlazeCommandDispatcherTest}.   *
+   ***************************************************************************/
+
+  @Command(name = "a", options = {FooOptions.class}, shortDescription = "", help = "")
+  private static class CommandA extends ConcreteCommand {}
+
+  @Command(name = "b", options = {BarOptions.class}, inherits = {CommandA.class},
+           shortDescription = "", help = "")
+  private static class CommandB extends ConcreteCommand {}
+
+  @Test
+  public void testOptionsAreInherited() {
+    ConfiguredRuleClassProvider ruleClassProvider = new ConfiguredRuleClassProvider.Builder()
+        .build();
+    MoreAsserts.assertSameContents(optionClassesWithDefault(FooOptions.class),
+        BlazeCommandUtils.getOptions(
+            CommandA.class, ImmutableList.<BlazeModule>of(), ruleClassProvider));
+    MoreAsserts.assertSameContents(optionClassesWithDefault(FooOptions.class, BarOptions.class),
+        BlazeCommandUtils.getOptions(
+            CommandB.class, ImmutableList.<BlazeModule>of(), ruleClassProvider));
+  }
+
+  private Collection<Class<?>> optionClassesWithDefault(Class<?>... optionClasses) {
+    List<Class<?>> result = new ArrayList<>();
+    Collections.addAll(result, optionClasses);
+    result.add(BlazeCommandEventHandler.Options.class);
+    result.add(CommonCommandOptions.class);
+    return result;
+  }
+}
diff --git a/src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/runtime/BlazeServerStartupOptionsTest.java b/src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/runtime/BlazeServerStartupOptionsTest.java
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..44f48a1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/runtime/BlazeServerStartupOptionsTest.java
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+// Copyright 2015 The Bazel Authors. All rights reserved.
+//
+// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
+// you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
+// You may obtain a copy of the License at
+//
+//    http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+//
+// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+// limitations under the License.
+package com.google.devtools.build.lib.runtime;
+
+import com.google.devtools.common.options.OptionsParser;
+
+import org.junit.Test;
+import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
+import org.junit.runners.JUnit4;
+
+import static org.junit.Assert.assertNull;
+
+/**
+ * A regression test for {@link BlazeServerStartupOptions}.
+ */
+@RunWith(JUnit4.class)
+public class BlazeServerStartupOptionsTest {
+
+  // A regression test to make sure that the output_base option is correctly parsed if no explicit
+  // value is provided.
+  @Test
+  public void testOutputBaseIsNullByDefault() throws Exception {
+    OptionsParser parser = OptionsParser.newOptionsParser(BlazeServerStartupOptions.class);
+    parser.parse();
+    BlazeServerStartupOptions result = parser.getOptions(BlazeServerStartupOptions.class);
+    assertNull(result.outputBase);
+  }
+}
diff --git a/src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/runtime/BlazeVersionInfoTest.java b/src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/runtime/BlazeVersionInfoTest.java
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..3f3c5ca
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/runtime/BlazeVersionInfoTest.java
@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
+// Copyright 2015 The Bazel Authors. All rights reserved.
+//
+// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
+// you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
+// You may obtain a copy of the License at
+//
+//    http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+//
+// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+// limitations under the License.
+package com.google.devtools.build.lib.runtime;
+
+import static java.util.Collections.singletonMap;
+import static org.junit.Assert.assertEquals;
+import static org.junit.Assert.assertFalse;
+import static org.junit.Assert.assertNull;
+
+import com.google.devtools.build.lib.analysis.BlazeVersionInfo;
+import com.google.devtools.build.lib.util.StringUtilities;
+
+import org.junit.Test;
+import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
+import org.junit.runners.JUnit4;
+
+import java.util.Collections;
+import java.util.HashMap;
+import java.util.Map;
+import java.util.TreeMap;
+
+/**
+ * Tests {@link BlazeVersionInfo}.
+ */
+@RunWith(JUnit4.class)
+public class BlazeVersionInfoTest {
+
+  @Test
+  public void testEmptyVersionInfoMeansNotAvailable() {
+    BlazeVersionInfo info = new BlazeVersionInfo(Collections.<String, String>emptyMap());
+    assertFalse(info.isAvailable());
+    assertNull(info.getSummary());
+    assertEquals("development version", info.getReleaseName());
+  }
+
+  @Test
+  public void testReleaseNameIsDevelopmentIfBuildLabelIsNull() {
+    Map<String, String> data = singletonMap("Build label", "");
+    BlazeVersionInfo info = new BlazeVersionInfo(data);
+    assertEquals("development version", info.getReleaseName());
+  }
+
+  @Test
+  public void testReleaseNameIfBuildLabelIsPresent() {
+    Map<String, String> data = singletonMap("Build label", "3/4/2009 (gold)");
+    BlazeVersionInfo info = new BlazeVersionInfo(data);
+    assertEquals("release 3/4/2009 (gold)", info.getReleaseName());
+  }
+
+  @Test
+  public void testFancySummaryFormatting() {
+    Map<String, String> data = new HashMap<>();
+    data.put("Some entry", "foo");
+    data.put("Another entry", "bar");
+    data.put("And a third entry", "baz");
+    BlazeVersionInfo info = new BlazeVersionInfo(data);
+    Map<String, String> sortedData = new TreeMap<>(data);
+    assertEquals(StringUtilities.layoutTable(sortedData), info.getSummary());
+  }
+}
diff --git a/src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/runtime/InvocationPolicyEnforcerTest.java b/src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/runtime/InvocationPolicyEnforcerTest.java
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..67bdd44
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/runtime/InvocationPolicyEnforcerTest.java
@@ -0,0 +1,780 @@
+// Copyright 2015 The Bazel Authors. All rights reserved.
+//
+// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
+// you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
+// You may obtain a copy of the License at
+//
+//    http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+//
+// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+// limitations under the License.
+
+package com.google.devtools.build.lib.runtime;
+
+import static com.google.common.truth.Truth.assertThat;
+import static org.junit.Assert.assertEquals;
+import static org.junit.Assert.assertFalse;
+import static org.junit.Assert.assertTrue;
+import static org.junit.Assert.fail;
+
+import com.google.common.io.BaseEncoding;
+import com.google.devtools.build.lib.runtime.proto.InvocationPolicyOuterClass.InvocationPolicy;
+import com.google.devtools.common.options.Option;
+import com.google.devtools.common.options.OptionsBase;
+import com.google.devtools.common.options.OptionsParser;
+import com.google.devtools.common.options.OptionsParsingException;
+
+import org.junit.Before;
+import org.junit.Test;
+import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
+import org.junit.runners.JUnit4;
+
+import java.io.ByteArrayOutputStream;
+import java.util.List;
+
+@RunWith(JUnit4.class)
+public class InvocationPolicyEnforcerTest {
+
+  private static final String STRING_FLAG_DEFAULT = "test string default";
+  
+  public static class TestOptions extends OptionsBase {
+
+    /*
+     * Basic types
+     */
+
+    @Option(name = "test_string", defaultValue = STRING_FLAG_DEFAULT)
+    public String testString;
+
+    /*
+     * Repeated flags
+     */
+
+    @Option(
+        name = "test_multiple_string",
+        defaultValue = "", // default value is ignored when allowMultiple = true.
+        allowMultiple = true)
+    public List<String> testMultipleString;
+
+    /*
+     * Expansion flags
+     */
+
+    @Option(
+        name = "test_expansion",
+        defaultValue = "null",
+        expansion = {"--test_expansion_a", "--test_expansion_b", "--test_expansion_c"})
+    public Void testExpansion;
+
+    @Option(name = "test_expansion_a", defaultValue = "false")
+    public boolean testExpansionA;
+
+    @Option(name = "test_expansion_b", defaultValue = "false")
+    public boolean testExpansionB;
+
+    @Option(name = "test_expansion_c", defaultValue = "false")
+    public boolean testExpansionC;
+
+    /*
+     * Implicit requirement flags
+     */
+
+    @Option(
+        name = "test_implicit_requirement",
+        defaultValue = "test implicit requirement default",
+        implicitRequirements = {"--an_implicit_requirement=foo"})
+    public String testImplicitRequirement;
+
+    @Option(
+        name = "an_implicit_requirement",
+        defaultValue = "implicit default")
+    public String anImplicitRequirement;
+
+  }
+
+  private static InvocationPolicyEnforcer createOptionsPolicyEnforcer(
+      InvocationPolicy.Builder invocationPolicyBuilder) throws Exception {
+    InvocationPolicy policyProto = invocationPolicyBuilder.build();
+
+    // An OptionsPolicyEnforcer could be constructed in the test directly from the InvocationPolicy
+    // proto, however Blaze will actually take the policy as another flag with a Base64 encoded
+    // binary proto and parse that, so exercise that code path in the test.
+
+    ByteArrayOutputStream out = new ByteArrayOutputStream();
+    policyProto.writeTo(out);
+    String policyBase64 = BaseEncoding.base64().encode(out.toByteArray());
+
+    OptionsParser startupOptionsParser = OptionsParser.newOptionsParser(
+        BlazeServerStartupOptions.class);
+    String policyOption = "--invocation_policy=" + policyBase64;
+    startupOptionsParser.parse(policyOption);
+
+    return InvocationPolicyEnforcer.create(startupOptionsParser);
+  }
+  
+  private OptionsParser parser;
+
+  @Before
+  public void setUp() throws Exception {
+    parser = OptionsParser.newOptionsParser(TestOptions.class);
+  }
+
+  private TestOptions getTestOptions() {
+    return parser.getOptions(TestOptions.class);
+  }
+
+  /*************************************************************************************************
+   * Tests for SetValue
+   ************************************************************************************************/
+
+  /**
+   * Tests that policy overrides a value when that value is from the user.
+   */
+  @Test
+  public void testSetValueOverridesUser() throws Exception {
+    InvocationPolicy.Builder invocationPolicyBuilder = InvocationPolicy.newBuilder();
+    invocationPolicyBuilder.addFlagPoliciesBuilder()
+        .setFlagName("test_string")
+        .getSetValueBuilder()
+            .addFlagValue("policy value");
+
+    InvocationPolicyEnforcer enforcer = createOptionsPolicyEnforcer(invocationPolicyBuilder);
+    parser.parse("--test_string=user value");
+
+    TestOptions testOptions = getTestOptions();
+    assertEquals("user value", testOptions.testString);
+
+    enforcer.enforce(parser, "build");
+
+    // Get the options again after policy enforcement.
+    testOptions = getTestOptions();
+    assertEquals("policy value", testOptions.testString);
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Tests that policy overrides a value when the user doesn't specify the value (i.e., the value
+   * is from the flag's default from its definition).
+   */
+  @Test
+  public void testSetValueOverridesDefault() throws Exception {
+    InvocationPolicy.Builder invocationPolicyBuilder = InvocationPolicy.newBuilder();
+    invocationPolicyBuilder.addFlagPoliciesBuilder()
+        .setFlagName("test_string")
+        .getSetValueBuilder()
+            .addFlagValue("policy value");
+
+    // No user value.
+    InvocationPolicyEnforcer enforcer = createOptionsPolicyEnforcer(invocationPolicyBuilder);
+
+    // All the flags should be their default value.
+    TestOptions testOptions = getTestOptions();
+    assertEquals(STRING_FLAG_DEFAULT, testOptions.testString);
+
+    enforcer.enforce(parser, "build");
+
+    // Get the options again after policy enforcement.
+    testOptions = getTestOptions();
+    assertEquals("policy value", testOptions.testString);
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Tests that SetValue overrides the user's value when the flag allows multiple values.
+   */
+  @Test
+  public void testSetValueWithMultipleValuesOverridesUser() throws Exception {
+    InvocationPolicy.Builder invocationPolicyBuilder = InvocationPolicy.newBuilder();
+    invocationPolicyBuilder.addFlagPoliciesBuilder()
+        .setFlagName("test_multiple_string")
+        .getSetValueBuilder()
+            .addFlagValue("policy value 1")
+            .addFlagValue("policy value 2");
+
+    InvocationPolicyEnforcer enforcer =  createOptionsPolicyEnforcer(invocationPolicyBuilder);
+    parser.parse("--test_multiple_string=user value 1", "--test_multiple_string=user value 2");
+
+    // Options should not be modified by running the parser through OptionsPolicyEnforcer.create().
+    TestOptions testOptions = getTestOptions();
+    assertThat(testOptions.testMultipleString)
+        .containsExactly("user value 1", "user value 2").inOrder();
+    //assertEquals(, testOptions.test_multiple_string);
+
+    enforcer.enforce(parser, "build");
+
+    // Get the options again after policy enforcement.
+    testOptions = getTestOptions();
+    assertThat(testOptions.testMultipleString)
+        .containsExactly("policy value 1", "policy value 2").inOrder();
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Tests that policy overrides the default value when the flag allows multiple values and the user
+   * doesn't provide a value.
+   */
+  @Test
+  public void testSetValueWithMultipleValuesOverridesDefault() throws Exception {
+    InvocationPolicy.Builder invocationPolicyBuilder = InvocationPolicy.newBuilder();
+    invocationPolicyBuilder.addFlagPoliciesBuilder()
+        .setFlagName("test_multiple_string")
+        .getSetValueBuilder()
+            .addFlagValue("policy value 1")
+            .addFlagValue("policy value 2");
+
+    // No user value.
+    InvocationPolicyEnforcer enforcer = createOptionsPolicyEnforcer(invocationPolicyBuilder);
+
+    // Repeatable flags always default to the empty list.
+    TestOptions testOptions = getTestOptions();
+    assertThat(testOptions.testMultipleString).isEmpty();
+
+    enforcer.enforce(parser, "build");
+
+    // Options should now be the values from the policy.
+    testOptions = getTestOptions();
+    assertThat(testOptions.testMultipleString)
+        .containsExactly("policy value 1", "policy value 2").inOrder();
+  }
+
+  @Test
+  public void testSetValueHasMultipleValuesButFlagIsNotMultiple() throws Exception {
+    InvocationPolicy.Builder invocationPolicyBuilder = InvocationPolicy.newBuilder();
+    invocationPolicyBuilder.addFlagPoliciesBuilder()
+        .setFlagName("test_string") // Not repeatable flag.
+        .getSetValueBuilder()
+            .addFlagValue("policy value 1") // Has multiple values.
+            .addFlagValue("policy value 2");
+
+    InvocationPolicyEnforcer enforcer = createOptionsPolicyEnforcer(invocationPolicyBuilder);
+
+    try {
+      enforcer.enforce(parser, "build");
+      fail();
+    } catch (OptionsParsingException e) {
+      // expected.
+    }
+  }
+
+  @Test
+  public void testSetValueWithExpansionFlags() throws Exception {
+    InvocationPolicy.Builder invocationPolicyBuilder = InvocationPolicy.newBuilder();
+    invocationPolicyBuilder.addFlagPoliciesBuilder()
+        .setFlagName("test_expansion_b")
+        .getSetValueBuilder()
+            .addFlagValue("false");
+
+    InvocationPolicyEnforcer enforcer = createOptionsPolicyEnforcer(invocationPolicyBuilder);
+    parser.parse("--test_expansion");
+
+    // --test_expansion should turn on test_expansion a, b, and c
+    TestOptions testOptions = getTestOptions();
+    assertTrue(testOptions.testExpansionA);
+    assertTrue(testOptions.testExpansionB);
+    assertTrue(testOptions.testExpansionC);
+
+    enforcer.enforce(parser, "build");
+
+    // After policy enforcement, test_expansion_b should be set to false, but the
+    // other two should remain the same.
+    testOptions = getTestOptions();
+    assertTrue(testOptions.testExpansionA);
+    assertFalse(testOptions.testExpansionB);
+    assertTrue(testOptions.testExpansionC);
+  }
+
+  @Test
+  public void testSetValueWithImplicitlyRequiredFlags() throws Exception {
+    InvocationPolicy.Builder invocationPolicyBuilder = InvocationPolicy.newBuilder();
+    invocationPolicyBuilder.addFlagPoliciesBuilder()
+        .setFlagName("an_implicit_requirement")
+        .getSetValueBuilder()
+            .addFlagValue("policy value");
+
+    InvocationPolicyEnforcer enforcer = createOptionsPolicyEnforcer(invocationPolicyBuilder);
+    parser.parse("--test_implicit_requirement=user value");
+
+    // test_implicit_requirement sets an_implicit_requirement to "foo"
+    TestOptions testOptions = getTestOptions();
+    assertEquals("user value", testOptions.testImplicitRequirement);
+    assertEquals("foo", testOptions.anImplicitRequirement);
+
+    enforcer.enforce(parser, "build");
+
+    testOptions = getTestOptions();
+    assertEquals("user value", testOptions.testImplicitRequirement);
+    assertEquals("policy value", testOptions.anImplicitRequirement);
+  }
+
+  @Test
+  public void testSetValueOverridable() throws Exception {
+    InvocationPolicy.Builder invocationPolicyBuilder = InvocationPolicy.newBuilder();
+    invocationPolicyBuilder.addFlagPoliciesBuilder()
+        .setFlagName("test_string")
+        .getSetValueBuilder()
+            .addFlagValue("policy value")
+            .setOverridable(true);
+
+    InvocationPolicyEnforcer enforcer = createOptionsPolicyEnforcer(invocationPolicyBuilder);
+    parser.parse("--test_string=user value");
+
+    // Repeatable flags always default to the empty list.
+    TestOptions testOptions = getTestOptions();
+    assertEquals("user value", testOptions.testString);
+
+    enforcer.enforce(parser, "build");
+
+    // Even though the policy sets the value for test_string, the policy is overridable and the
+    // user set the value, so it should be the user's value.
+    testOptions = getTestOptions();
+    assertEquals("user value", testOptions.testString);
+  }
+
+  @Test
+  public void testSetValueWithNoValueThrows() throws Exception {
+    InvocationPolicy.Builder invocationPolicyBuilder = InvocationPolicy.newBuilder();
+    invocationPolicyBuilder.addFlagPoliciesBuilder()
+        .setFlagName("test_string")
+        .getSetValueBuilder(); // No value.
+
+    InvocationPolicyEnforcer enforcer = createOptionsPolicyEnforcer(invocationPolicyBuilder);
+    parser.parse("--test_string=user value");
+
+    // Repeatable flags always default to the empty list.
+    TestOptions testOptions = getTestOptions();
+    assertEquals("user value", testOptions.testString);
+
+    try {
+      enforcer.enforce(parser, "build");
+      fail();
+    } catch (OptionsParsingException e) {
+      // expected.
+    }
+  }
+
+  /*************************************************************************************************
+   * Tests for UseDefault
+   ************************************************************************************************/
+
+  @Test
+  public void testUseDefault() throws Exception {
+    InvocationPolicy.Builder invocationPolicyBuilder = InvocationPolicy.newBuilder();
+    invocationPolicyBuilder.addFlagPoliciesBuilder()
+        .setFlagName("test_string")
+        .getUseDefaultBuilder();
+
+    InvocationPolicyEnforcer enforcer = createOptionsPolicyEnforcer(invocationPolicyBuilder);
+    parser.parse("--test_string=user value");
+
+    // Options should be the user specified value before enforcing policy.
+    TestOptions testOptions = getTestOptions();
+    assertEquals("user value", testOptions.testString);
+
+    enforcer.enforce(parser, "build");
+
+    // Get the options again after policy enforcement: The flag should now be back to its default
+    // value
+    testOptions = getTestOptions();
+    assertEquals(STRING_FLAG_DEFAULT, testOptions.testString);
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Tests UseDefault when the user never actually specified the flag.
+   */
+  @Test
+  public void testUseDefaultWhenFlagWasntSet() throws Exception {
+    InvocationPolicy.Builder invocationPolicyBuilder = InvocationPolicy.newBuilder();
+    invocationPolicyBuilder.addFlagPoliciesBuilder()
+        .setFlagName("test_string")
+        .getUseDefaultBuilder();
+
+    InvocationPolicyEnforcer enforcer = createOptionsPolicyEnforcer(invocationPolicyBuilder);
+
+    // Options should be the default since the user never specified it.
+    TestOptions testOptions = getTestOptions();
+    assertEquals(STRING_FLAG_DEFAULT, testOptions.testString);
+
+    enforcer.enforce(parser, "build");
+
+    // Still the default.
+    testOptions = getTestOptions();
+    assertEquals(STRING_FLAG_DEFAULT, testOptions.testString);
+  }
+
+  @Test
+  public void testUseDefaultWithExpansionFlags() throws Exception {
+    InvocationPolicy.Builder invocationPolicyBuilder = InvocationPolicy.newBuilder();
+    invocationPolicyBuilder.addFlagPoliciesBuilder()
+        .setFlagName("test_expansion_b")
+        .getUseDefaultBuilder();
+
+    InvocationPolicyEnforcer enforcer = createOptionsPolicyEnforcer(invocationPolicyBuilder);
+    parser.parse("--test_expansion");
+
+    // --test_expansion should turn on test_expansion a, b, and c
+    TestOptions testOptions = getTestOptions();
+    assertTrue(testOptions.testExpansionA);
+    assertTrue(testOptions.testExpansionB);
+    assertTrue(testOptions.testExpansionC);
+
+    enforcer.enforce(parser, "build");
+
+    // After policy enforcement, test_expansion_b should be back to its default (false), but the
+    // other two should remain the same.
+    testOptions = getTestOptions();
+    assertTrue(testOptions.testExpansionA);
+    assertFalse(testOptions.testExpansionB);
+    assertTrue(testOptions.testExpansionC);
+  }
+
+  @Test
+  public void testUseDefaultWithImplicitlyRequiredFlags() throws Exception {
+    InvocationPolicy.Builder invocationPolicyBuilder = InvocationPolicy.newBuilder();
+    invocationPolicyBuilder.addFlagPoliciesBuilder()
+        .setFlagName("an_implicit_requirement")
+        .getUseDefaultBuilder();
+
+    InvocationPolicyEnforcer enforcer = createOptionsPolicyEnforcer(invocationPolicyBuilder);
+    parser.parse("--test_implicit_requirement=user value",
+        "--an_implicit_requirement=implicit user value");
+
+    // test_implicit_requirement sets an_implicit_requirement to "foo", which ignores the user's
+    // value because the parser processes implicit values last.
+    TestOptions testOptions = getTestOptions();
+    assertEquals("user value", testOptions.testImplicitRequirement);
+    assertEquals("foo", testOptions.anImplicitRequirement);
+
+    // Then policy puts an_implicit_requirement back to its default.
+    enforcer.enforce(parser, "build");
+
+    testOptions = getTestOptions();
+    assertEquals("user value", testOptions.testImplicitRequirement);
+    assertEquals("implicit default", testOptions.anImplicitRequirement);
+  }
+  
+  /*************************************************************************************************
+   * Tests for AllowValues
+   ************************************************************************************************/
+
+  /**
+   * Tests that AllowValues works in the normal case where the value the user specified is allowed
+   * by the policy.
+   */
+  @Test
+  public void testAllowValuesAllowsValue() throws Exception {
+    InvocationPolicy.Builder invocationPolicyBuilder = InvocationPolicy.newBuilder();
+    invocationPolicyBuilder.addFlagPoliciesBuilder()
+        .setFlagName("test_string")
+        .getAllowValuesBuilder()
+            .addAllowedValues(STRING_FLAG_DEFAULT)
+            .addAllowedValues("foo")
+            .addAllowedValues("bar");
+
+    InvocationPolicyEnforcer enforcer = createOptionsPolicyEnforcer(invocationPolicyBuilder);
+    parser.parse("--test_string=foo");
+
+    // Option should be "foo" as specified by the user.
+    TestOptions testOptions = getTestOptions();
+    assertEquals("foo", testOptions.testString);
+
+    enforcer.enforce(parser, "build");
+
+    // Still "foo" since "foo" is allowed by the policy.
+    testOptions = getTestOptions();
+    assertEquals("foo", testOptions.testString);
+  }
+
+  @Test
+  public void testAllowValuesDisallowsValue() throws Exception {
+    InvocationPolicy.Builder invocationPolicyBuilder = InvocationPolicy.newBuilder();
+    invocationPolicyBuilder.addFlagPoliciesBuilder()
+        .setFlagName("test_string")
+        .getAllowValuesBuilder()
+            // no foo!
+            .addAllowedValues(STRING_FLAG_DEFAULT)
+            .addAllowedValues("bar");
+
+    InvocationPolicyEnforcer enforcer = createOptionsPolicyEnforcer(invocationPolicyBuilder);
+    parser.parse("--test_string=foo");
+
+    // Option should be "foo" as specified by the user.
+    TestOptions testOptions = getTestOptions();
+    assertEquals("foo", testOptions.testString);
+
+    try {
+      // Should throw because "foo" is not allowed.
+      enforcer.enforce(parser, "build");
+      fail();
+    } catch (OptionsParsingException e) {
+      // expected
+    }
+  }
+
+  @Test
+  public void testAllowValuesDisallowsMultipleValues() throws Exception {
+    InvocationPolicy.Builder invocationPolicyBuilder = InvocationPolicy.newBuilder();
+    invocationPolicyBuilder.addFlagPoliciesBuilder()
+        .setFlagName("test_multiple_string")
+        .getAllowValuesBuilder()
+            .addAllowedValues("foo")
+            .addAllowedValues("bar");
+
+    InvocationPolicyEnforcer enforcer = createOptionsPolicyEnforcer(invocationPolicyBuilder);
+    parser.parse("--test_multiple_string=baz", "--test_multiple_string=bar");
+
+    // Option should be "baz" and "bar" as specified by the user.
+    TestOptions testOptions = getTestOptions();
+    assertThat(testOptions.testMultipleString).containsExactly("baz", "bar").inOrder();
+
+    try {
+      enforcer.enforce(parser, "build");
+      fail();
+    } catch (OptionsParsingException e) {
+      // expected, since baz is not allowed.
+    }
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Tests that AllowValues sets its default value when the user doesn't provide a value and the
+   * flag's default value is disallowed.
+   */
+  @Test
+  public void testAllowValuesSetsNewDefaultWhenFlagDefaultIsDisallowed() throws Exception {
+    InvocationPolicy.Builder invocationPolicyBuilder = InvocationPolicy.newBuilder();
+    invocationPolicyBuilder.addFlagPoliciesBuilder()
+        .setFlagName("test_string")
+        .getAllowValuesBuilder()
+            // default value from flag's definition is not allowed
+            .addAllowedValues("foo")
+            .addAllowedValues("bar")
+            .setNewDefaultValue("new default");
+
+    InvocationPolicyEnforcer enforcer = createOptionsPolicyEnforcer(invocationPolicyBuilder);
+
+    // Option should be its default
+    TestOptions testOptions = getTestOptions();
+    assertEquals(STRING_FLAG_DEFAULT, testOptions.testString);
+
+    enforcer.enforce(parser, "build");
+
+    // Flag's value should be the default value from the policy.
+    testOptions = getTestOptions();
+    assertEquals("new default", testOptions.testString);
+  }
+
+  @Test
+  public void testAllowValuesDisallowsFlagDefaultButNoPolicyDefault() throws Exception {
+    InvocationPolicy.Builder invocationPolicyBuilder = InvocationPolicy.newBuilder();
+    invocationPolicyBuilder.addFlagPoliciesBuilder()
+        .setFlagName("test_string")
+        .getAllowValuesBuilder()
+            // default value from flag's definition is not allowed, and no alternate default
+            // is given.
+            .addAllowedValues("foo")
+            .addAllowedValues("bar");
+
+    InvocationPolicyEnforcer enforcer = createOptionsPolicyEnforcer(invocationPolicyBuilder);
+
+    // Option should be its default
+    TestOptions testOptions = getTestOptions();
+    assertEquals(STRING_FLAG_DEFAULT, testOptions.testString);
+
+    try {
+      enforcer.enforce(parser, "build");
+      fail();
+    } catch (OptionsParsingException e) {
+      // expected.
+    }
+  }
+
+  /*************************************************************************************************
+   * Tests for DisallowValues
+   ************************************************************************************************/
+
+  @Test
+  public void testDisallowValuesAllowsValue() throws Exception {
+    InvocationPolicy.Builder invocationPolicyBuilder = InvocationPolicy.newBuilder();
+    invocationPolicyBuilder.addFlagPoliciesBuilder()
+        .setFlagName("test_string")
+        .getDisallowValuesBuilder()
+            .addDisallowedValues("foo")
+            .addDisallowedValues("bar");
+
+    InvocationPolicyEnforcer enforcer = createOptionsPolicyEnforcer(invocationPolicyBuilder);
+    parser.parse("--test_string=baz");
+
+    // Option should be "baz" as specified by the user.
+    TestOptions testOptions = getTestOptions();
+    assertEquals("baz", testOptions.testString);
+
+    enforcer.enforce(parser, "build");
+
+    // Still "baz" since "baz" is allowed by the policy.
+    testOptions = getTestOptions();
+    assertEquals("baz", testOptions.testString);
+  }
+
+  @Test
+  public void testDisallowValuesDisallowsValue() throws Exception {
+    InvocationPolicy.Builder invocationPolicyBuilder = InvocationPolicy.newBuilder();
+    invocationPolicyBuilder.addFlagPoliciesBuilder()
+        .setFlagName("test_string")
+        .getDisallowValuesBuilder()
+            .addDisallowedValues("foo")
+            .addDisallowedValues("bar");
+
+    InvocationPolicyEnforcer enforcer = createOptionsPolicyEnforcer(invocationPolicyBuilder);
+    parser.parse("--test_string=foo");
+
+    // Option should be "foo" as specified by the user.
+    TestOptions testOptions = getTestOptions();
+    assertEquals("foo", testOptions.testString);
+
+    try {
+      enforcer.enforce(parser, "build");
+      fail();
+    } catch (OptionsParsingException e) {
+      // expected, since foo is disallowed.
+    }
+  }
+
+  @Test
+  public void testDisallowValuesDisallowsMultipleValues() throws Exception {
+    InvocationPolicy.Builder invocationPolicyBuilder = InvocationPolicy.newBuilder();
+    invocationPolicyBuilder.addFlagPoliciesBuilder()
+        .setFlagName("test_multiple_string")
+        .getDisallowValuesBuilder()
+            .addDisallowedValues("foo")
+            .addDisallowedValues("bar");
+
+    InvocationPolicyEnforcer enforcer = createOptionsPolicyEnforcer(invocationPolicyBuilder);
+    parser.parse("--test_multiple_string=baz", "--test_multiple_string=bar");
+
+    // Option should be "baz" and "bar" as specified by the user.
+    TestOptions testOptions = getTestOptions();
+    assertThat(testOptions.testMultipleString).containsExactly("baz", "bar").inOrder();
+
+    try {
+      enforcer.enforce(parser, "build");
+      fail();
+    } catch (OptionsParsingException e) {
+      // expected, since bar is disallowed.
+    }
+  }
+
+  @Test
+  public void testDisallowValuesSetsNewDefaultWhenFlagDefaultIsDisallowed() throws Exception {
+    InvocationPolicy.Builder invocationPolicyBuilder = InvocationPolicy.newBuilder();
+    invocationPolicyBuilder.addFlagPoliciesBuilder()
+        .setFlagName("test_string")
+        .getDisallowValuesBuilder()
+            .addDisallowedValues(STRING_FLAG_DEFAULT)
+            .setNewDefaultValue("baz");
+
+    InvocationPolicyEnforcer enforcer = createOptionsPolicyEnforcer(invocationPolicyBuilder);
+
+    // Option should be the default since the use didn't specify a value.
+    TestOptions testOptions = getTestOptions();
+    assertEquals(STRING_FLAG_DEFAULT, testOptions.testString);
+
+    enforcer.enforce(parser, "build");
+
+    // Should now be "baz" because the policy set the new default to "baz"
+    testOptions = getTestOptions();
+    assertEquals("baz", testOptions.testString);
+  }
+
+  @Test
+  public void testDisallowValuesDisallowsFlagDefaultButNoPolicyDefault() throws Exception {
+    InvocationPolicy.Builder invocationPolicyBuilder = InvocationPolicy.newBuilder();
+    invocationPolicyBuilder.addFlagPoliciesBuilder()
+        .setFlagName("test_string")
+        .getDisallowValuesBuilder()
+            // No new default is set
+            .addDisallowedValues(STRING_FLAG_DEFAULT);
+
+    InvocationPolicyEnforcer enforcer = createOptionsPolicyEnforcer(invocationPolicyBuilder);
+
+    // Option should be the default since the use didn't specify a value.
+    TestOptions testOptions = getTestOptions();
+    assertEquals(STRING_FLAG_DEFAULT, testOptions.testString);
+
+    try {
+      enforcer.enforce(parser, "build");
+      fail();
+    } catch (OptionsParsingException e) {
+      // expected.
+    }
+  }
+  
+  /*************************************************************************************************
+   * Other tests
+   ************************************************************************************************/
+
+  @Test
+  public void testFlagPolicyDoesNotApply() throws Exception {
+    InvocationPolicy.Builder invocationPolicyBuilder = InvocationPolicy.newBuilder();
+    invocationPolicyBuilder.addFlagPoliciesBuilder()
+        .setFlagName("test_string")
+        .addCommands("build")
+        .getSetValueBuilder()
+            .addFlagValue("policy value");
+
+    InvocationPolicyEnforcer enforcer = createOptionsPolicyEnforcer(invocationPolicyBuilder);
+    parser.parse("--test_string=user value");
+
+    TestOptions testOptions = getTestOptions();
+    assertEquals("user value", testOptions.testString);
+
+    enforcer.enforce(parser, "test");
+
+    // Still user value.
+    testOptions = getTestOptions();
+    assertEquals("user value", testOptions.testString);
+  }
+
+  @Test
+  public void testNonExistantFlagFromPolicy() throws Exception {
+    InvocationPolicy.Builder invocationPolicyBuilder = InvocationPolicy.newBuilder();
+    invocationPolicyBuilder.addFlagPoliciesBuilder()
+        .setFlagName("i_do_not_exist")
+        .getSetValueBuilder()
+            .addFlagValue("policy value 1");
+    invocationPolicyBuilder.addFlagPoliciesBuilder()
+        .setFlagName("test_string")
+        .getSetValueBuilder()
+            .addFlagValue("policy value 2");
+    
+    InvocationPolicyEnforcer enforcer = createOptionsPolicyEnforcer(invocationPolicyBuilder);
+    parser.parse("--test_string=user value");
+
+    TestOptions testOptions = getTestOptions();
+    assertEquals("user value", testOptions.testString);
+
+    enforcer.enforce(parser, "test");
+
+    // Still user value.
+    testOptions = getTestOptions();
+    assertEquals("policy value 2", testOptions.testString);
+  }
+
+  @Test
+  public void testOperationNotSet() throws Exception {
+    InvocationPolicy.Builder invocationPolicyBuilder = InvocationPolicy.newBuilder();
+    invocationPolicyBuilder.addFlagPoliciesBuilder();
+    // No operations added to the flag policy
+    
+    InvocationPolicyEnforcer enforcer = createOptionsPolicyEnforcer(invocationPolicyBuilder);
+    parser.parse("--test_string=user value");
+    
+    TestOptions testOptions = getTestOptions();
+    assertEquals("user value", testOptions.testString);
+
+    // Shouldn't throw.
+    enforcer.enforce(parser, "test");
+
+    // Still user value.
+    testOptions = getTestOptions();
+    assertEquals("user value", testOptions.testString);
+  }
+}
diff --git a/src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/runtime/TestResultAnalyzerTest.java b/src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/runtime/TestResultAnalyzerTest.java
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..05c94c1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/runtime/TestResultAnalyzerTest.java
@@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
+// Copyright 2015 The Bazel Authors. All rights reserved.
+//
+// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
+// you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
+// You may obtain a copy of the License at
+//
+//    http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+//
+// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+// limitations under the License.
+package com.google.devtools.build.lib.runtime;
+
+import static org.junit.Assert.assertFalse;
+import static org.junit.Assert.assertTrue;
+import static org.mockito.Mockito.mock;
+import static org.mockito.Mockito.when;
+
+import com.google.common.collect.ImmutableList;
+import com.google.common.eventbus.EventBus;
+import com.google.devtools.build.lib.analysis.ConfiguredTarget;
+import com.google.devtools.build.lib.exec.ExecutionOptions;
+import com.google.devtools.build.lib.packages.TestTimeout;
+import com.google.devtools.build.lib.rules.test.TestProvider;
+import com.google.devtools.build.lib.rules.test.TestProvider.TestParams;
+import com.google.devtools.build.lib.rules.test.TestResult;
+import com.google.devtools.build.lib.rules.test.TestRunnerAction;
+import com.google.devtools.build.lib.runtime.TerminalTestResultNotifier.TestSummaryOptions;
+import com.google.devtools.build.lib.testutil.Suite;
+import com.google.devtools.build.lib.testutil.TestSpec;
+import com.google.devtools.build.lib.vfs.Path;
+import com.google.devtools.build.lib.view.test.TestStatus.BlazeTestStatus;
+import com.google.devtools.build.lib.view.test.TestStatus.TestResultData;
+import com.google.devtools.common.options.OptionsParser;
+
+import org.junit.Before;
+import org.junit.Test;
+import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
+import org.junit.runners.JUnit4;
+
+@TestSpec(size = Suite.SMALL_TESTS)
+@RunWith(JUnit4.class)
+public class TestResultAnalyzerTest {
+
+  private TestResultAnalyzer underTest;
+  
+  @Before
+  public void setUp() {
+    Path mockPath = mock(Path.class);
+    OptionsParser testSpecificOptions = OptionsParser.newOptionsParser(
+        TestSummaryOptions.class, ExecutionOptions.class);
+    EventBus mockBus = mock(EventBus.class);
+    underTest = new TestResultAnalyzer(
+        mockPath,
+        testSpecificOptions.getOptions(TestSummaryOptions.class),
+        testSpecificOptions.getOptions(ExecutionOptions.class),
+        mockBus);
+  }
+
+  @Test
+  public void testIncrementalAnalyzeSetsActionRanTrueWhenThereAreNonCachedResults() {
+    TestSummary.Builder summaryBuilder = makeTestSummaryBuilder();
+    assertFalse(summaryBuilder.peek().actionRan());
+    
+    TestResultData testResultData = TestResultData.newBuilder().setRemotelyCached(false).build();
+    TestResult result = new TestResult(
+        mock(TestRunnerAction.class),
+        testResultData,
+        /*cached=*/false);
+
+    TestSummary.Builder newSummaryBuilder = underTest.incrementalAnalyze(summaryBuilder, result);
+    assertTrue(newSummaryBuilder.peek().actionRan());
+  }
+
+  @Test
+  public void testIncrementalAnalyzeSetsActionRanFalseForLocallyCachedTests() {
+    TestSummary.Builder summaryBuilder = makeTestSummaryBuilder();
+    assertFalse(summaryBuilder.peek().actionRan());
+    
+    TestResultData testResultData = TestResultData.newBuilder().setRemotelyCached(false).build();
+    TestResult result = new TestResult(
+        mock(TestRunnerAction.class),
+        testResultData,
+        /*cached=*/true);
+    
+    TestSummary.Builder newSummaryBuilder = underTest.incrementalAnalyze(summaryBuilder, result);
+    assertFalse(newSummaryBuilder.peek().actionRan());
+  }
+
+  @Test
+  public void testIncrementalAnalyzeSetsActionRanFalseForRemotelyCachedTests() {
+    TestSummary.Builder summaryBuilder = makeTestSummaryBuilder();
+    assertFalse(summaryBuilder.peek().actionRan());
+    
+    TestResultData testResultData = TestResultData.newBuilder().setRemotelyCached(true).build();
+    TestResult result = new TestResult(
+        mock(TestRunnerAction.class),
+        testResultData,
+        /*cached=*/false);
+
+    TestSummary.Builder newSummaryBuilder = underTest.incrementalAnalyze(summaryBuilder, result);
+    assertFalse(newSummaryBuilder.peek().actionRan());
+  }
+
+  @Test
+  public void testIncrementalAnalyzeKeepsActionRanTrueWhenAlreadyTrueAndNewCachedResults() {
+    TestSummary.Builder summaryBuilder = makeTestSummaryBuilder().setActionRan(true);
+    
+    TestResultData testResultData = TestResultData.newBuilder().setRemotelyCached(true).build();
+    TestResult result = new TestResult(
+        mock(TestRunnerAction.class),
+        testResultData,
+        /*cached=*/true);
+
+    TestSummary.Builder newSummaryBuilder = underTest.incrementalAnalyze(summaryBuilder, result);
+    assertTrue(newSummaryBuilder.peek().actionRan());
+  }
+
+  private TestSummary.Builder makeTestSummaryBuilder() {
+    // a lot of mocks to mock out fetching the TestTimeout configuration needed by
+    //  {@link TestResultAnalyzer#shouldEmitTestSizeWarningInSummary(...)
+    TestParams mockParams = mock(TestParams.class);
+    when(mockParams.getTimeout()).thenReturn(TestTimeout.LONG);
+    TestProvider testProvider = new TestProvider(mockParams, ImmutableList.<String>of());
+    
+    ConfiguredTarget mockTarget = mock(ConfiguredTarget.class);
+    when(mockTarget.getProvider(TestProvider.class)).thenReturn(testProvider);
+    
+    return TestSummary.newBuilder()
+        .setStatus(BlazeTestStatus.PASSED)
+        .setTarget(mockTarget);
+    
+  }
+  
+}
diff --git a/src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/runtime/TestSummaryTest.java b/src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/runtime/TestSummaryTest.java
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e08df35
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/test/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/runtime/TestSummaryTest.java
@@ -0,0 +1,492 @@
+// Copyright 2015 The Bazel Authors. All rights reserved.
+//
+// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
+// you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
+// You may obtain a copy of the License at
+//
+//    http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+//
+// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+// limitations under the License.
+
+package com.google.devtools.build.lib.runtime;
+
+import static org.junit.Assert.assertEquals;
+import static org.junit.Assert.assertNotSame;
+import static org.junit.Assert.assertSame;
+import static org.junit.Assert.assertTrue;
+import static org.mockito.AdditionalMatchers.find;
+import static org.mockito.AdditionalMatchers.not;
+import static org.mockito.Mockito.verify;
+import static org.mockito.Matchers.contains;
+import static org.mockito.Mockito.when;
+
+import com.google.common.collect.ImmutableList;
+import com.google.devtools.build.lib.analysis.ConfiguredTarget;
+import com.google.devtools.build.lib.cmdline.Label;
+import com.google.devtools.build.lib.util.BlazeClock;
+import com.google.devtools.build.lib.util.io.AnsiTerminalPrinter;
+import com.google.devtools.build.lib.vfs.FileSystem;
+import com.google.devtools.build.lib.vfs.FileSystemUtils;
+import com.google.devtools.build.lib.vfs.Path;
+import com.google.devtools.build.lib.vfs.inmemoryfs.InMemoryFileSystem;
+import com.google.devtools.build.lib.view.test.TestStatus.BlazeTestStatus;
+import com.google.devtools.build.lib.view.test.TestStatus.FailedTestCasesStatus;
+import com.google.devtools.build.lib.view.test.TestStatus.TestCase;
+import org.junit.Before;
+import org.junit.Test;
+import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
+import org.junit.runners.JUnit4;
+import org.mockito.InOrder;
+import org.mockito.Mockito;
+
+import java.util.ArrayList;
+import java.util.Arrays;
+import java.util.List;
+
+@RunWith(JUnit4.class)
+public class TestSummaryTest {
+
+  private static final String ANY_STRING = ".*?";
+  private static final String PATH = "package";
+  private static final String TARGET_NAME = "name";
+  private ConfiguredTarget stubTarget;
+  private static final List<Long> SMALL_TIMING = ImmutableList.of(1L, 2L, 3L, 4L);
+
+  private static final int CACHED = SMALL_TIMING.size();
+  private static final int NOT_CACHED = 0;
+
+  private FileSystem fs;
+  private TestSummary.Builder basicBuilder;
+
+  @Before
+  public void setUp() throws Exception {
+    fs = new InMemoryFileSystem(BlazeClock.instance());
+    stubTarget = stubTarget();
+    basicBuilder = getTemplateBuilder();
+  }
+
+  private TestSummary.Builder getTemplateBuilder() {
+    return TestSummary.newBuilder()
+        .setTarget(stubTarget)
+        .setStatus(BlazeTestStatus.PASSED)
+        .setNumCached(NOT_CACHED)
+        .setActionRan(true)
+        .setRanRemotely(false)
+        .setWasUnreportedWrongSize(false);
+  }
+
+  private List<Path> getPathList(String... names) {
+    List<Path> list = new ArrayList<>();
+    for (String name : names) {
+      list.add(fs.getPath(name));
+    }
+    return list;
+  }
+
+  @Test
+  public void testShouldProperlyTestLabels() throws Exception {
+    ConfiguredTarget target = target("somepath", "MyTarget");
+    String expectedString = ANY_STRING + "//somepath:MyTarget" + ANY_STRING;
+    AnsiTerminalPrinter terminalPrinter = Mockito.mock(AnsiTerminalPrinter.class);
+
+    TestSummary summaryStatus = createTestSummary(target, BlazeTestStatus.PASSED, CACHED);
+    TestSummaryPrinter.print(summaryStatus, terminalPrinter, true, false);
+    terminalPrinter.print(find(expectedString));
+  }
+
+  @Test
+  public void testShouldPrintPassedStatus() throws Exception {
+    String expectedString = ANY_STRING + "INFO" + ANY_STRING + BlazeTestStatus.PASSED + ANY_STRING;
+    AnsiTerminalPrinter terminalPrinter = Mockito.mock(AnsiTerminalPrinter.class);
+
+    TestSummary summary = createTestSummary(stubTarget, BlazeTestStatus.PASSED, NOT_CACHED);
+    TestSummaryPrinter.print(summary, terminalPrinter, true, false);
+
+    terminalPrinter.print(find(expectedString));
+  }
+
+  @Test
+  public void testShouldPrintFailedStatus() throws Exception {
+    String expectedString = ANY_STRING + "ERROR" + ANY_STRING + BlazeTestStatus.FAILED + ANY_STRING;
+    AnsiTerminalPrinter terminalPrinter = Mockito.mock(AnsiTerminalPrinter.class);
+
+    TestSummary summary = createTestSummary(stubTarget, BlazeTestStatus.FAILED, NOT_CACHED);
+
+    TestSummaryPrinter.print(summary, terminalPrinter, true, false);
+
+    terminalPrinter.print(find(expectedString));
+  }
+
+  @Test
+  public void testShouldPrintCachedStatus() throws Exception {
+    String expectedString = ANY_STRING + "\\(cached" + ANY_STRING;
+    AnsiTerminalPrinter terminalPrinter = Mockito.mock(AnsiTerminalPrinter.class);
+
+    TestSummary summary = createTestSummary(stubTarget, BlazeTestStatus.PASSED, CACHED);
+
+    TestSummaryPrinter.print(summary, terminalPrinter, true, false);
+
+    terminalPrinter.print(find(expectedString));
+  }
+
+  @Test
+  public void testPartialCachedStatus() throws Exception {
+    String expectedString = ANY_STRING + "\\(3/4 cached" + ANY_STRING;
+    AnsiTerminalPrinter terminalPrinter = Mockito.mock(AnsiTerminalPrinter.class);
+
+    TestSummary summary = createTestSummary(stubTarget, BlazeTestStatus.PASSED, CACHED - 1);
+    TestSummaryPrinter.print(summary, terminalPrinter, true, false);
+    terminalPrinter.print(find(expectedString));
+  }
+
+  @Test
+  public void testIncompleteCached() throws Exception {
+    AnsiTerminalPrinter terminalPrinter = Mockito.mock(AnsiTerminalPrinter.class);
+    TestSummary summary = createTestSummary(stubTarget, BlazeTestStatus.INCOMPLETE, CACHED - 1);
+    TestSummaryPrinter.print(summary, terminalPrinter, true, false);
+    verify(terminalPrinter).print(not(contains("cached")));
+  }
+
+  @Test
+  public void testShouldPrintUncachedStatus() throws Exception {
+    AnsiTerminalPrinter terminalPrinter = Mockito.mock(AnsiTerminalPrinter.class);
+    TestSummary summary = createTestSummary(stubTarget, BlazeTestStatus.PASSED, NOT_CACHED);
+    TestSummaryPrinter.print(summary, terminalPrinter, true, false);
+    verify(terminalPrinter).print(not(contains("cached")));
+  }
+
+  @Test
+  public void testNoTiming() throws Exception {
+    String expectedString = ANY_STRING + "INFO" + ANY_STRING + BlazeTestStatus.PASSED;
+    AnsiTerminalPrinter terminalPrinter = Mockito.mock(AnsiTerminalPrinter.class);
+
+    TestSummary summary = createTestSummary(stubTarget, BlazeTestStatus.PASSED, NOT_CACHED);
+
+    TestSummaryPrinter.print(summary, terminalPrinter, true, false);
+    terminalPrinter.print(find(expectedString));
+  }
+
+  @Test
+  public void testBuilder() throws Exception {
+    // No need to copy if built twice in a row; no direct setters on the object.
+    TestSummary summary = basicBuilder.build();
+    TestSummary sameSummary = basicBuilder.build();
+    assertSame(summary, sameSummary);
+
+    basicBuilder.addTestTimes(ImmutableList.of(40L));
+
+    TestSummary summaryCopy = basicBuilder.build();
+    assertEquals(summary.getTarget(), summaryCopy.getTarget());
+    assertEquals(summary.getStatus(), summaryCopy.getStatus());
+    assertEquals(summary.numCached(), summaryCopy.numCached());
+    assertNotSame(summary, summaryCopy);
+    assertEquals(0, summary.totalRuns());
+    assertEquals(1, summaryCopy.totalRuns());
+
+    // Check that the builder can add a new warning to the copy,
+    // despite the immutability of the original.
+    basicBuilder.addTestTimes(ImmutableList.of(60L));
+
+    TestSummary fiftyCached = basicBuilder.setNumCached(50).build();
+    assertEquals(summary.getStatus(), fiftyCached.getStatus());
+    assertEquals(50, fiftyCached.numCached());
+    assertEquals(2, fiftyCached.totalRuns());
+
+    TestSummary sixtyCached = basicBuilder.setNumCached(60).build();
+    assertEquals(60, sixtyCached.numCached());
+    assertEquals(50, fiftyCached.numCached());
+
+    TestSummary failedCacheTemplate = TestSummary.newBuilderFromExisting(fiftyCached)
+        .setStatus(BlazeTestStatus.FAILED)
+        .build();
+    assertEquals(50, failedCacheTemplate.numCached());
+    assertEquals(BlazeTestStatus.FAILED, failedCacheTemplate.getStatus());
+  }
+
+  @Test
+  public void testSingleTime() throws Exception {
+    String expectedString = ANY_STRING + "INFO" + ANY_STRING + BlazeTestStatus.PASSED + ANY_STRING +
+                            "in 3.4s";
+    AnsiTerminalPrinter terminalPrinter = Mockito.mock(AnsiTerminalPrinter.class);
+
+    TestSummary summary = basicBuilder.addTestTimes(ImmutableList.of(3412L)).build();
+    TestSummaryPrinter.print(summary, terminalPrinter, true, false);
+    terminalPrinter.print(find(expectedString));
+  }
+
+  @Test
+  public void testNoTime() throws Exception {
+    // The last part matches anything not containing "in".
+    String expectedString = ANY_STRING + "INFO" + ANY_STRING + BlazeTestStatus.PASSED + "(?!in)*";
+    AnsiTerminalPrinter terminalPrinter = Mockito.mock(AnsiTerminalPrinter.class);
+
+    TestSummary summary = basicBuilder.addTestTimes(ImmutableList.of(3412L)).build();
+    TestSummaryPrinter.print(summary, terminalPrinter, false, false);
+    terminalPrinter.print(find(expectedString));
+  }
+
+  @Test
+  public void testMultipleTimes() throws Exception {
+    String expectedString = ANY_STRING + "INFO" + ANY_STRING + BlazeTestStatus.PASSED + ANY_STRING +
+                            "\n  Stats over 3 runs: max = 3.0s, min = 1.0s, " +
+                            "avg = 2.0s, dev = 0.8s";
+    AnsiTerminalPrinter terminalPrinter = Mockito.mock(AnsiTerminalPrinter.class);
+    TestSummary summary = basicBuilder
+        .addTestTimes(ImmutableList.of(1000L, 2000L, 3000L))
+        .build();
+    TestSummaryPrinter.print(summary, terminalPrinter, true, false);
+    terminalPrinter.print(find(expectedString));
+  }
+
+  @Test
+  public void testCoverageDataReferences() throws Exception {
+    List<Path> paths = getPathList("/cov1.dat", "/cov2.dat", "/cov3.dat", "/cov4.dat");
+    FileSystemUtils.writeContentAsLatin1(paths.get(1), "something");
+    FileSystemUtils.writeContentAsLatin1(paths.get(3), "");
+    FileSystemUtils.writeContentAsLatin1(paths.get(3), "something else");
+    TestSummary summary = basicBuilder.addCoverageFiles(paths).build();
+
+    AnsiTerminalPrinter terminalPrinter = Mockito.mock(AnsiTerminalPrinter.class);
+    TestSummaryPrinter.print(summary, terminalPrinter, true, false);
+    verify(terminalPrinter).print(find(ANY_STRING + "INFO" + ANY_STRING + BlazeTestStatus.PASSED));
+    verify(terminalPrinter).print(find("  /cov2.dat"));
+    verify(terminalPrinter).print(find("  /cov4.dat"));
+  }
+
+  @Test
+  public void testFlakyAttempts() throws Exception {
+    String expectedString = ANY_STRING + "WARNING" + ANY_STRING + BlazeTestStatus.FLAKY +
+        ANY_STRING + ", failed in 2 out of 3";
+    AnsiTerminalPrinter terminalPrinter = Mockito.mock(AnsiTerminalPrinter.class);
+
+    TestSummary summary = basicBuilder
+        .setStatus(BlazeTestStatus.FLAKY)
+        .addPassedLogs(getPathList("/a"))
+        .addFailedLogs(getPathList("/b", "/c"))
+        .build();
+    TestSummaryPrinter.print(summary, terminalPrinter, true, false);
+    terminalPrinter.print(find(expectedString));
+  }
+
+  @Test
+  public void testNumberOfFailedRuns() throws Exception {
+    String expectedString = ANY_STRING + "ERROR" + ANY_STRING + BlazeTestStatus.FAILED +
+    ANY_STRING + "in 2 out of 3";
+    AnsiTerminalPrinter terminalPrinter = Mockito.mock(AnsiTerminalPrinter.class);
+
+    TestSummary summary = basicBuilder
+        .setStatus(BlazeTestStatus.FAILED)
+        .addPassedLogs(getPathList("/a"))
+        .addFailedLogs(getPathList("/b", "/c"))
+        .build();
+    TestSummaryPrinter.print(summary, terminalPrinter, true, false);
+    terminalPrinter.print(find(expectedString));
+  }
+
+  @Test
+  public void testFileNamesNotShown() throws Exception {
+    List<TestCase> emptyDetails = ImmutableList.of();
+    TestSummary summary = basicBuilder
+        .setStatus(BlazeTestStatus.FAILED)
+        .addPassedLogs(getPathList("/apple"))
+        .addFailedLogs(getPathList("/pear"))
+        .addCoverageFiles(getPathList("/maracuja"))
+        .addFailedTestCases(emptyDetails, FailedTestCasesStatus.FULL)
+        .build();
+
+    // Check that only //package:name is printed.
+    AnsiTerminalPrinter printer = Mockito.mock(AnsiTerminalPrinter.class);
+    TestSummaryPrinter.print(summary, printer, true, true);
+    verify(printer).print(contains("//package:name"));
+  }
+
+  @Test
+  public void testMessageShownWhenTestCasesMissing() throws Exception {
+    ImmutableList<TestCase> emptyList = ImmutableList.of();
+    TestSummary summary = createTestSummaryWithDetails(
+        BlazeTestStatus.FAILED, emptyList, FailedTestCasesStatus.NOT_AVAILABLE);
+
+    AnsiTerminalPrinter printer = Mockito.mock(AnsiTerminalPrinter.class);
+    TestSummaryPrinter.print(summary, printer, true, true);
+    verify(printer).print(contains("//package:name"));
+    verify(printer).print(contains("not available"));
+  }
+
+  @Test
+  public void testMessageShownForPartialResults() throws Exception {
+    ImmutableList<TestCase> testCases =
+        ImmutableList.of(newDetail("orange", TestCase.Status.FAILED, 1500L));
+    TestSummary summary = createTestSummaryWithDetails(BlazeTestStatus.FAILED, testCases,
+        FailedTestCasesStatus.PARTIAL);
+
+    AnsiTerminalPrinter printer = Mockito.mock(AnsiTerminalPrinter.class);
+    TestSummaryPrinter.print(summary, printer, true, true);
+    verify(printer).print(contains("//package:name"));
+    verify(printer).print(find("FAILED.*orange"));
+    verify(printer).print(contains("incomplete"));
+  }
+
+  private TestCase newDetail(String name,  TestCase.Status status, long duration) {
+    return TestCase.newBuilder()
+        .setName(name)
+        .setStatus(status)
+        .setRunDurationMillis(duration).build();
+  }
+
+  @Test
+  public void testTestCaseNamesShownWhenNeeded() throws Exception {
+    TestCase detailPassed =
+        newDetail("strawberry", TestCase.Status.PASSED, 1000L);
+    TestCase detailFailed =
+        newDetail("orange", TestCase.Status.FAILED, 1500L);
+
+    TestSummary summaryPassed = createTestSummaryWithDetails(
+        BlazeTestStatus.PASSED, Arrays.asList(detailPassed));
+
+    TestSummary summaryFailed = createTestSummaryWithDetails(
+        BlazeTestStatus.FAILED, Arrays.asList(detailPassed, detailFailed));
+    assertEquals(BlazeTestStatus.FAILED, summaryFailed.getStatus());
+
+    AnsiTerminalPrinter printerPassed = Mockito.mock(AnsiTerminalPrinter.class);
+    TestSummaryPrinter.print(summaryPassed, printerPassed, true, true);
+    verify(printerPassed).print(contains("//package:name"));
+
+    AnsiTerminalPrinter printerFailed = Mockito.mock(AnsiTerminalPrinter.class);
+    TestSummaryPrinter.print(summaryFailed, printerFailed, true, true);
+    verify(printerFailed).print(contains("//package:name"));
+    verify(printerFailed).print(find("FAILED.*orange *\\(1\\.5"));
+  }
+
+  @Test
+  public void testTestCaseNamesOrdered() throws Exception {
+    TestCase[] details = {
+      newDetail("apple", TestCase.Status.FAILED, 1000L),
+      newDetail("banana", TestCase.Status.FAILED, 1000L),
+      newDetail("cranberry", TestCase.Status.FAILED, 1000L)
+    };
+
+    // The exceedingly dumb approach: writing all the permutations down manually
+    // is simply easier than any way of generating them.
+    int[][] permutations = {
+        { 0, 1, 2 },
+        { 0, 2, 1 },
+        { 1, 0, 2 },
+        { 1, 2, 0 },
+        { 2, 0, 1 },
+        { 2, 1, 0 }
+    };
+
+    for (int[] permutation : permutations) {
+      List<TestCase> permutatedDetails = new ArrayList<>();
+
+      for (int element : permutation) {
+        permutatedDetails.add(details[element]);
+      }
+
+      TestSummary summary = createTestSummaryWithDetails(BlazeTestStatus.FAILED, permutatedDetails);
+
+      // A mock that checks the ordering of method calls
+      AnsiTerminalPrinter printer = Mockito.mock(AnsiTerminalPrinter.class);
+      TestSummaryPrinter.print(summary, printer, true, true);
+      InOrder order = Mockito.inOrder(printer);
+      order.verify(printer).print(contains("//package:name"));
+      order.verify(printer).print(find("FAILED.*apple"));
+      order.verify(printer).print(find("FAILED.*banana"));
+      order.verify(printer).print(find("FAILED.*cranberry"));
+    }
+  }
+
+  @Test
+  public void testCachedResultsFirstInSort() throws Exception {
+    TestSummary summaryFailedCached = createTestSummary(BlazeTestStatus.FAILED, CACHED);
+    TestSummary summaryFailedNotCached = createTestSummary(BlazeTestStatus.FAILED, NOT_CACHED);
+    TestSummary summaryPassedCached = createTestSummary(BlazeTestStatus.PASSED, CACHED);
+    TestSummary summaryPassedNotCached = createTestSummary(BlazeTestStatus.PASSED, NOT_CACHED);
+
+    // This way we can make the test independent from the sort order of FAILEd
+    // and PASSED.
+
+    assertTrue(summaryFailedCached.compareTo(summaryPassedNotCached) < 0);
+    assertTrue(summaryPassedCached.compareTo(summaryFailedNotCached) < 0);
+  }
+
+  @Test
+  public void testCollectingFailedDetails() throws Exception {
+    TestCase rootCase = TestCase.newBuilder()
+        .setName("tests")
+        .setRunDurationMillis(5000L)
+        .addChild(newDetail("apple", TestCase.Status.FAILED, 1000L))
+        .addChild(newDetail("banana", TestCase.Status.PASSED, 1000L))
+        .addChild(newDetail("cherry", TestCase.Status.ERROR, 1000L))
+        .build();
+
+    TestSummary summary = getTemplateBuilder()
+        .collectFailedTests(rootCase)
+        .setStatus(BlazeTestStatus.FAILED)
+        .build();
+
+    AnsiTerminalPrinter printer = Mockito.mock(AnsiTerminalPrinter.class);
+    TestSummaryPrinter.print(summary, printer, true, true);
+    verify(printer).print(contains("//package:name"));
+    verify(printer).print(find("FAILED.*apple"));
+    verify(printer).print(find("ERROR.*cherry"));
+  }
+
+  private ConfiguredTarget target(String path, String targetName) throws Exception {
+    ConfiguredTarget target = Mockito.mock(ConfiguredTarget.class);
+    when(target.getLabel()).thenReturn(Label.create(path, targetName));
+    return target;
+  }
+
+  private ConfiguredTarget stubTarget() throws Exception {
+    return target(PATH, TARGET_NAME);
+  }
+
+  private TestSummary createTestSummaryWithDetails(BlazeTestStatus status,
+      List<TestCase> details) {
+    TestSummary summary = getTemplateBuilder()
+        .setStatus(status)
+        .addFailedTestCases(details, FailedTestCasesStatus.FULL)
+        .build();
+    return summary;
+  }
+
+  private TestSummary createTestSummaryWithDetails(
+      BlazeTestStatus status, List<TestCase> testCaseList,
+      FailedTestCasesStatus detailsStatus) {
+    TestSummary summary = getTemplateBuilder()
+        .setStatus(status)
+        .addFailedTestCases(testCaseList, detailsStatus)
+        .build();
+    return summary;
+  }
+
+  private static TestSummary createTestSummary(ConfiguredTarget target, BlazeTestStatus status,
+                                               int numCached) {
+    ImmutableList<TestCase> emptyList = ImmutableList.of();
+    TestSummary summary = TestSummary.newBuilder()
+        .setTarget(target)
+        .setStatus(status)
+        .setNumCached(numCached)
+        .setActionRan(true)
+        .setRanRemotely(false)
+        .setWasUnreportedWrongSize(false)
+        .addFailedTestCases(emptyList, FailedTestCasesStatus.FULL)
+        .addTestTimes(SMALL_TIMING)
+        .build();
+    return summary;
+  }
+
+  private TestSummary createTestSummary(BlazeTestStatus status, int numCached) {
+    TestSummary summary = getTemplateBuilder()
+        .setStatus(status)
+        .setNumCached(numCached)
+        .addTestTimes(SMALL_TIMING)
+        .build();
+    return summary;
+  }
+}