commit 8af05fd087e22d3bbc08c9e9772f934440c7a0a8
author elenairina <elenairina@google.com> Thu Dec 20 02:49:08 2018 -0800
committer Copybara-Service <copybara-piper@google.com> Thu Dec 20 02:50:38 2018 -0800
tree bed082e76a707bc88a01526fff3843819f5ebd9a
parent a5ba344fdf887cd898ee0ffb9a0f0d5f749b7cf1

Fix label name used for jacoco-runtime in AndroidBinary.

The check for the label is actually not needed since all android rules have this implicit dependency, but just for extra safety let's keep the correct label.

This check was added in https://github.com/bazelbuild/bazel/commit/57fc4be8f17ae0c77a8587de46e3d2965c67aa00.

RELNOTES: None.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 226306817

src/main/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/rules/android/AndroidBinary.java

diff --git a/src/main/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/rules/android/AndroidBinary.java b/src/main/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/rules/android/AndroidBinary.java
index df83e01..156f5ac 100644
--- a/src/main/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/rules/android/AndroidBinary.java
+++ b/src/main/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/rules/android/AndroidBinary.java
@@ -363,7 +363,7 @@
         proguardDeps,
         ruleContext.getPrerequisites("deps", Mode.TARGET, ProguardSpecProvider.PROVIDER));
     if (ruleContext.getConfiguration().isCodeCoverageEnabled()
-        && ruleContext.attributes().has("$jacoco-runtime", BuildType.LABEL)) {
+        && ruleContext.attributes().has("$jacoco_runtime", BuildType.LABEL)) {
       proguardDeps.add(
           ruleContext.getPrerequisite(
               "$jacoco_runtime", Mode.TARGET, ProguardSpecProvider.PROVIDER));