C++: fix formatting of files that commonly complicate diffs
These files don't follow the style guide, so every cl that touches them also reformats pieces of them. Doing one big reformat to simplify future reviews.
RELNOTES:none
PiperOrigin-RevId: 237244551
diff --git a/src/main/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/syntax/StarlarkSemantics.java b/src/main/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/syntax/StarlarkSemantics.java
index 857d7b9..9d14165 100644
--- a/src/main/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/syntax/StarlarkSemantics.java
+++ b/src/main/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/syntax/StarlarkSemantics.java
@@ -76,22 +76,21 @@
* Returns true if a feature attached to the given toggling flags should be enabled.
*
* <ul>
- * <li>If both parameters are {@code NONE}, this indicates the feature is not
- * controlled by flags, and should thus be enabled.</li>
- * <li>If the {@code enablingFlag} parameter is non-{@code NONE}, this returns
- * true if and only if that flag is true. (This represents a feature that is only on
- * if a given flag is *on*).</li>
- * <li>If the {@code disablingFlag} parameter is non-{@code NONE}, this returns
- * true if and only if that flag is false. (This represents a feature that is only on
- * if a given flag is *off*).</li>
- * <li>It is illegal to pass both parameters as non-{@code NONE}.</li>
+ * <li>If both parameters are {@code NONE}, this indicates the feature is not controlled by
+ * flags, and should thus be enabled.
+ * <li>If the {@code enablingFlag} parameter is non-{@code NONE}, this returns true if and only
+ * if that flag is true. (This represents a feature that is only on if a given flag is
+ * *on*).
+ * <li>If the {@code disablingFlag} parameter is non-{@code NONE}, this returns true if and only
+ * if that flag is false. (This represents a feature that is only on if a given flag is
+ * *off*).
+ * <li>It is illegal to pass both parameters as non-{@code NONE}.
* </ul>
*/
public boolean isFeatureEnabledBasedOnTogglingFlags(
- FlagIdentifier enablingFlag,
- FlagIdentifier disablingFlag) {
- Preconditions.checkArgument(enablingFlag == FlagIdentifier.NONE
- || disablingFlag == FlagIdentifier.NONE,
+ FlagIdentifier enablingFlag, FlagIdentifier disablingFlag) {
+ Preconditions.checkArgument(
+ enablingFlag == FlagIdentifier.NONE || disablingFlag == FlagIdentifier.NONE,
"at least one of 'enablingFlag' or 'disablingFlag' must be NONE");
if (enablingFlag != FlagIdentifier.NONE) {
return enablingFlag.semanticsFunction.apply(this);
