blob: 4538bfdb9411e2d99a5248502f0d6bc665bb08d2 [file] [view]
---
layout: documentation
title: Optimizing Performance
---
# Optimizing Performance
<!-- [TOC] -->
Skylark efficiency often involves avoiding O(N^2) in time and/or space.
Crucially this involves understanding depsets and avoiding their expansion.
This can be hard to get right, so Bazel also provides a memory profiler that
assists you in finding spots where you might have made a mistake.
## Use depsets
Whenever you are rolling up information from rule dependencies you should use
[depsets](lib/depset.html). Only use plain lists or dicts to publish information
local to the current rule.
A depset represents information as a nested graph which enables sharing.
Consider the following graph:
```
C -> B -> A
D ---^
```
Each node publishes a single string. With depsets the data looks like this:
```
a = depset(direct=['a'])
b = depset(direct=['b'], transitive=[a])
c = depset(direct=['c'], transitive=[b])
d = depset(direct=['d'], transitive=[b])
```
Note that each item is only mentioned once. With lists you would get this:
```
a = ['a']
b = ['b', 'a']
c = ['c', 'b', 'a']
d = ['d', 'b', 'a']
```
Note that in this case `'a'` is mentioned four times! With larger graphs this
problem will only get worse.
Here is an example of a rule implementation that uses depsets correctly to
publish transitive information. Note that it is OK to publish rule-local
information using lists if you want since this is not O(N^2).
```
MyProvider = provider()
def _impl(ctx):
my_things = ctx.attr.things
all_things = depset(
direct=my_things,
transitive=[dep[MyProvider].all_things for dep in ctx.attr.deps]
)
...
return [MyProvider(
my_things=my_things, # OK, a flat list of rule-local things only
all_things=all_things, # OK, a depset containing dependencies
)]
```
See the [depset overview](depsets.md) page for more information.
### Never call `depset#to_list`
You can coerce a depset to a flat list using [to_list](lib/depset.html#to_list).
This should be considered debugging functionality. Any flattening of a depset in
a rule implementation is almost always O(N^2).
A common misconception is that you can freely flatten at the very top level,
eg. at the `xx_binary` level. This is *still* O(N^2) when you build a set
of overlapping targets. This happens when building your tests
`//foo/tests/...`, or when importing an IDE project.
**Note**: Today it is possible to flatten depsets implicitly. Anywhere you
iterate a depset (explicitly or implicitly), or take its size, you are
effectively calling `to_list`. This functionality will soon be removed.
### Never call `len(depset)`
It is O(N) to get the number of items in a depset. It is however
O(1) to check if a depset is empty. This includes checking the truthiness
of a depset:
```
def _impl(ctx):
args = ctx.actions.args()
files = depset(...)
# Bad, has to iterate over entire depset to get length
if len(files) == 0:
args.add("--files")
args.add(files)
# Good, O(1)
if files:
args.add("--files")
args.add(files)
```
## Use `ctx.actions.args()` for command lines
When building command lines you should use [ctx.actions.args()](lib/Args.html).
This defers expansion of any depsets to the execution phase.
Apart from being strictly faster, this will reduce the memory consumption of
your rules -- sometimes by 90% or more.
Here are some tricks:
* Pass depsets and lists directly as arguments, instead of flattening them
yourself. They will get expanded by `ctx.actions.args()` for you.
If you need any transformations on the depset contents, look at
[ctx.actions.args#add](lib/Args.html#add) to see if anything fits the bill.
* Are you passing `File#path` as arguments? No need. Any
[File](lib/File.html) is automatically turned into its
[path](lib/File.html#path), deferred to expansion time.
* Avoid constructing strings by concatenating them together.
The best string argument is a constant as its memory will be shared between
all instances of your rule.
* If the args are too long for the command line an `ctx.actions.args()` object
can be conditionally or unconditionally written to a param file using
[`ctx.actions.args#use_param_file`](lib/Args.html#use_param_file). This is
done behind the scenes when the action is executed. If you need to explictly
control the params file you can write it manually using
[`ctx.actions.write`](lib/actions.html#write).
Example:
```
def _impl(ctx):
...
args = ctx.actions.Args()
file = ctx.declare_file(...)
files = depset(...)
# Bad, constructs a full string "--foo=<file path>" for each rule instance
args.add("--foo=" + file.path)
# Good, shares "-foo" among all rule instances, and defers file.path to later
args.add("--foo")
args.add(file)
# Bad, makes a giant string of a whole depset
args.add(" ".join(["-I%s" % file.short_path for file in files])
# Good, only stores a reference to the depset
args.add(files, format="-I%s", map_fn=_to_short_path)
# Function passed to map_fn above
def _to_short_path(files):
return [file.short_path for file in files]
```
## Transitive action inputs should be depsets
When building an action using [ctx.actions.run](lib/actions.html?#run), do not
forget that the `inputs` field accepts a depset. Use this whenever inputs are
collected from dependencies transitively.
```
inputs = depset(...)
ctx.actions.run(
inputs = inputs, # Do *not* turn inputs into a list
...
)
```
## Memory Profiling
Bazel comes with a built-in memory profiler that can help you check your rule's
memory use. If there is a problem you can dump the Skylark heap to find the
exact line of code that is causing the problem.
### Enabling Memory Tracking
You must pass these two startup flags to *every* Bazel invocation:
```
STARTUP_FLAGS=\
--host_jvm_args=-javaagent:$(BAZEL)/third_party/allocation_instrumenter/java-allocation-instrumenter-3.0.1.jar \
--host_jvm_args=-DRULE_MEMORY_TRACKER=1
```
**NOTE**: The bazel repository comes with an allocation instrumenter.
Make sure to adjust '$(BAZEL)' for your repository location.
-->
These start the server in memory tracking mode. If you forget these for even
one Bazel invocation the server will restart and you will have to start over.
### Using the Memory Tracker
Let's have a look at the target `foo` and see what it's up to. We add
`--nobuild` since it doesn't matter to memory consumption if we actually build
or not, we just have to run the analysis phase.
```
$ bazel $(STARTUP_FLAGS) build --nobuild //foo:foo
```
Let's see how much memory the whole Bazel instance consumes:
```
$ bazel $(STARTUP_FLAGS) info used-heap-size-after-gc
> 2594MB
```
Let's break it down by rule class by using `bazel dump --rules`:
```
$ bazel $(STARTUP_FLAGS) dump --rules
>
RULE COUNT ACTIONS BYTES EACH
genrule 33,762 33,801 291,538,824 8,635
config_setting 25,374 0 24,897,336 981
filegroup 25,369 25,369 97,496,272 3,843
cc_library 5,372 73,235 182,214,456 33,919
proto_library 4,140 110,409 186,776,864 45,115
android_library 2,621 36,921 218,504,848 83,366
java_library 2,371 12,459 38,841,000 16,381
_gen_source 719 2,157 9,195,312 12,789
_check_proto_library_deps 719 668 1,835,288 2,552
... (more output)
```
And finally let's have a look at where the memory is going by producing a
`pprof` file using `bazel dump --skylark_memory`:
```
$ bazel $(STARTUP_FLAGS) dump --skylark_memory=$HOME/prof.gz
> Dumping skylark heap to: /usr/local/google/home/$USER/prof.gz
```
Next, we use the `pprof` tool to investigate the heap. A good starting point is
getting a flame graph by using `pprof -flame $HOME/prof.gz`.
You can get `pprof` from https://github.com/google/pprof.
-->
In this case we get a text dump of the hottest call sites annotated with lines:
```
$ pprof -text -lines $HOME/prof.gz
>
flat flat% sum% cum cum%
146.11MB 19.64% 19.64% 146.11MB 19.64% android_library <native>:-1
113.02MB 15.19% 34.83% 113.02MB 15.19% genrule <native>:-1
74.11MB 9.96% 44.80% 74.11MB 9.96% glob <native>:-1
55.98MB 7.53% 52.32% 55.98MB 7.53% filegroup <native>:-1
53.44MB 7.18% 59.51% 53.44MB 7.18% sh_test <native>:-1
26.55MB 3.57% 63.07% 26.55MB 3.57% _generate_foo_files /foo/tc/tc.bzl:491
26.01MB 3.50% 66.57% 26.01MB 3.50% _build_foo_impl /foo/build_test.bzl:78
22.01MB 2.96% 69.53% 22.01MB 2.96% _build_foo_impl /foo/build_test.bzl:73
... (more output)
```