| // Copyright 2014 Google Inc. All rights reserved. | |
| // | |
| // Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); | |
| // you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. | |
| // You may obtain a copy of the License at | |
| // | |
| // http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 | |
| // | |
| // Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software | |
| // distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, | |
| // WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. | |
| // See the License for the specific language governing permissions and | |
| // limitations under the License. | |
| package com.google.devtools.build.lib.analysis; | |
| import com.google.common.base.Function; | |
| import com.google.common.base.Preconditions; | |
| import com.google.common.collect.ArrayListMultimap; | |
| import com.google.common.collect.ImmutableList; | |
| import com.google.common.collect.ImmutableSet; | |
| import com.google.common.collect.ListMultimap; | |
| import com.google.common.collect.Sets; | |
| import com.google.devtools.build.lib.analysis.config.BuildConfiguration; | |
| import com.google.devtools.build.lib.analysis.config.ConfigMatchingProvider; | |
| import com.google.devtools.build.lib.collect.ImmutableSortedKeyListMultimap; | |
| import com.google.devtools.build.lib.packages.AspectDefinition; | |
| import com.google.devtools.build.lib.packages.AspectFactory; | |
| import com.google.devtools.build.lib.packages.Attribute; | |
| import com.google.devtools.build.lib.packages.Attribute.ConfigurationTransition; | |
| import com.google.devtools.build.lib.packages.Attribute.LateBoundDefault; | |
| import com.google.devtools.build.lib.packages.Attribute.SplitTransition; | |
| import com.google.devtools.build.lib.packages.AttributeMap; | |
| import com.google.devtools.build.lib.packages.EnvironmentGroup; | |
| import com.google.devtools.build.lib.packages.InputFile; | |
| import com.google.devtools.build.lib.packages.NoSuchThingException; | |
| import com.google.devtools.build.lib.packages.OutputFile; | |
| import com.google.devtools.build.lib.packages.PackageGroup; | |
| import com.google.devtools.build.lib.packages.Rule; | |
| import com.google.devtools.build.lib.packages.RuleClass; | |
| import com.google.devtools.build.lib.packages.Target; | |
| import com.google.devtools.build.lib.packages.Type; | |
| import com.google.devtools.build.lib.skyframe.ConfiguredTargetKey; | |
| import com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.EvalException; | |
| import com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Label; | |
| import java.util.ArrayList; | |
| import java.util.Collection; | |
| import java.util.LinkedHashSet; | |
| import java.util.List; | |
| import java.util.Map; | |
| import java.util.Set; | |
| import java.util.regex.Pattern; | |
| import java.util.regex.PatternSyntaxException; | |
| import javax.annotation.Nullable; | |
| /** | |
| * Resolver for dependencies between configured targets. | |
| * | |
| * <p>Includes logic to derive the right configurations depending on transition type. | |
| */ | |
| public abstract class DependencyResolver { | |
| /** | |
| * A dependency of a configured target through a label. | |
| * | |
| * <p>Includes the target and the configuration of the dependency configured target and any | |
| * aspects that may be required. | |
| * | |
| * <p>Note that the presence of an aspect here does not necessarily mean that it will be created. | |
| * They will be filtered based on the {@link TransitiveInfoProvider} instances their associated | |
| * configured targets have (we cannot do that here because the configured targets are not | |
| * available yet). No error or warning is reported in this case, because it is expected that rules | |
| * sometimes over-approximate the providers they supply in their definitions. | |
| */ | |
| public static final class Dependency { | |
| /** | |
| * Returns the {@link ConfiguredTargetKey} for a direct dependency. | |
| * | |
| * <p>Essentially the same information as {@link Dependency} minus the aspects. | |
| */ | |
| public static final Function<Dependency, ConfiguredTargetKey> | |
| TO_CONFIGURED_TARGET_KEY = new Function<Dependency, ConfiguredTargetKey>() { | |
| @Override | |
| public ConfiguredTargetKey apply(Dependency input) { | |
| return new ConfiguredTargetKey(input.getLabel(), input.getConfiguration()); | |
| } | |
| }; | |
| private final Label label; | |
| private final BuildConfiguration configuration; | |
| private final ImmutableSet<Class<? extends ConfiguredAspectFactory>> aspects; | |
| public Dependency(Label label, BuildConfiguration configuration, | |
| ImmutableSet<Class<? extends ConfiguredAspectFactory>> aspects) { | |
| this.label = label; | |
| this.configuration = configuration; | |
| this.aspects = aspects; | |
| } | |
| public Dependency(Label label, BuildConfiguration configuration) { | |
| this(label, configuration, ImmutableSet.<Class<? extends ConfiguredAspectFactory>>of()); | |
| } | |
| public Label getLabel() { | |
| return label; | |
| } | |
| public BuildConfiguration getConfiguration() { | |
| return configuration; | |
| } | |
| public ImmutableSet<Class<? extends ConfiguredAspectFactory>> getAspects() { | |
| return aspects; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| protected DependencyResolver() { | |
| } | |
| /** | |
| * Returns ids for dependent nodes of a given node, sorted by attribute. Note that some | |
| * dependencies do not have a corresponding attribute here, and we use the null attribute to | |
| * represent those edges. Visibility attributes are only visited if {@code visitVisibility} is | |
| * {@code true}. | |
| * | |
| * <p>If {@code aspect} is null, returns the dependent nodes of the configured target node | |
| * representing the given target and configuration, otherwise that of the aspect node accompanying | |
| * the aforementioned configured target node for the specified aspect. | |
| * | |
| * <p>The values are not simply labels because this also implements the first step of applying | |
| * configuration transitions, namely, split transitions. This needs to be done before the labels | |
| * are resolved because late bound attributes depend on the configuration. A good example for this | |
| * is @{code :cc_toolchain}. | |
| * | |
| * <p>The long-term goal is that most configuration transitions be applied here. However, in order | |
| * to do that, we first have to eliminate transitions that depend on the rule class of the | |
| * dependency. | |
| */ | |
| public final ListMultimap<Attribute, Dependency> dependentNodeMap( | |
| TargetAndConfiguration node, AspectDefinition aspect, | |
| Set<ConfigMatchingProvider> configConditions) | |
| throws EvalException { | |
| Target target = node.getTarget(); | |
| BuildConfiguration config = node.getConfiguration(); | |
| ListMultimap<Attribute, Dependency> outgoingEdges = ArrayListMultimap.create(); | |
| if (target instanceof OutputFile) { | |
| Preconditions.checkNotNull(config); | |
| visitTargetVisibility(node, outgoingEdges.get(null)); | |
| Rule rule = ((OutputFile) target).getGeneratingRule(); | |
| outgoingEdges.put(null, new Dependency(rule.getLabel(), config)); | |
| } else if (target instanceof InputFile) { | |
| visitTargetVisibility(node, outgoingEdges.get(null)); | |
| } else if (target instanceof EnvironmentGroup) { | |
| visitTargetVisibility(node, outgoingEdges.get(null)); | |
| } else if (target instanceof Rule) { | |
| Preconditions.checkNotNull(config); | |
| visitTargetVisibility(node, outgoingEdges.get(null)); | |
| Rule rule = (Rule) target; | |
| ListMultimap<Attribute, LabelAndConfiguration> labelMap = | |
| resolveAttributes(rule, aspect, config, configConditions); | |
| visitRule(rule, aspect, labelMap, outgoingEdges); | |
| } else if (target instanceof PackageGroup) { | |
| visitPackageGroup(node, (PackageGroup) target, outgoingEdges.get(null)); | |
| } else { | |
| throw new IllegalStateException(target.getLabel().toString()); | |
| } | |
| return outgoingEdges; | |
| } | |
| private ListMultimap<Attribute, LabelAndConfiguration> resolveAttributes( | |
| Rule rule, AspectDefinition aspect, BuildConfiguration configuration, | |
| Set<ConfigMatchingProvider> configConditions) | |
| throws EvalException { | |
| ConfiguredAttributeMapper attributeMap = ConfiguredAttributeMapper.of(rule, configConditions); | |
| attributeMap.validateAttributes(); | |
| List<Attribute> attributes; | |
| if (aspect == null) { | |
| attributes = rule.getRuleClassObject().getAttributes(); | |
| } else { | |
| attributes = new ArrayList<>(); | |
| attributes.addAll(rule.getRuleClassObject().getAttributes()); | |
| if (aspect != null) { | |
| attributes.addAll(aspect.getAttributes().values()); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| ImmutableSortedKeyListMultimap.Builder<Attribute, LabelAndConfiguration> result = | |
| ImmutableSortedKeyListMultimap.builder(); | |
| resolveExplicitAttributes(rule, configuration, attributeMap, result); | |
| resolveImplicitAttributes(rule, configuration, attributeMap, attributes, result); | |
| resolveLateBoundAttributes(rule, configuration, attributeMap, attributes, result); | |
| // Add the rule's visibility labels (which may come from the rule or from package defaults). | |
| addExplicitDeps(result, rule, "visibility", rule.getVisibility().getDependencyLabels(), | |
| configuration); | |
| // Add package default constraints when the rule doesn't explicitly declare them. | |
| // | |
| // Note that this can have subtle implications for constraint semantics. For example: say that | |
| // package defaults declare compatibility with ':foo' and rule R declares compatibility with | |
| // ':bar'. Does that mean that R is compatible with [':foo', ':bar'] or just [':bar']? In other | |
| // words, did R's author intend to add additional compatibility to the package defaults or to | |
| // override them? More severely, what if package defaults "restrict" support to just [':baz']? | |
| // Should R's declaration signify [':baz'] + ['bar'], [ORIGINAL_DEFAULTS] + ['bar'], or | |
| // something else? | |
| // | |
| // Rather than try to answer these questions with possibly confusing logic, we take the | |
| // simple approach of assigning the rule's "restriction" attribute to the rule-declared value if | |
| // it exists, else the package defaults value (and likewise for "compatibility"). This may not | |
| // always provide what users want, but it makes it easy for them to understand how rule | |
| // declarations and package defaults intermix (and how to refactor them to get what they want). | |
| // | |
| // An alternative model would be to apply the "rule declaration" / "rule class defaults" | |
| // relationship, i.e. the rule class' "compatibility" and "restriction" declarations are merged | |
| // to generate a set of default environments, then the rule's declarations are independently | |
| // processed on top of that. This protects against obscure coupling behavior between | |
| // declarations from wildly different places (e.g. it offers clear answers to the examples posed | |
| // above). But within the scope of a single package it seems better to keep the model simple and | |
| // make the user responsible for resolving ambiguities. | |
| if (!rule.isAttributeValueExplicitlySpecified(RuleClass.COMPATIBLE_ENVIRONMENT_ATTR)) { | |
| addExplicitDeps(result, rule, RuleClass.COMPATIBLE_ENVIRONMENT_ATTR, | |
| rule.getPackage().getDefaultCompatibleWith(), configuration); | |
| } | |
| if (!rule.isAttributeValueExplicitlySpecified(RuleClass.RESTRICTED_ENVIRONMENT_ATTR)) { | |
| addExplicitDeps(result, rule, RuleClass.RESTRICTED_ENVIRONMENT_ATTR, | |
| rule.getPackage().getDefaultRestrictedTo(), configuration); | |
| } | |
| return result.build(); | |
| } | |
| /** | |
| * Adds new dependencies to the given rule under the given attribute name | |
| * | |
| * @param result the builder for the attribute --> dependency labels map | |
| * @param rule the rule being evaluated | |
| * @param attrName the name of the attribute to add dependency labels to | |
| * @param labels the dependencies to add | |
| * @param configuration the configuration to apply to those dependencies | |
| */ | |
| private void addExplicitDeps( | |
| ImmutableSortedKeyListMultimap.Builder<Attribute, LabelAndConfiguration> result, Rule rule, | |
| String attrName, Iterable<Label> labels, BuildConfiguration configuration) { | |
| if (!rule.isAttrDefined(attrName, Type.LABEL_LIST) | |
| && !rule.isAttrDefined(attrName, Type.NODEP_LABEL_LIST)) { | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| Attribute attribute = rule.getRuleClassObject().getAttributeByName(attrName); | |
| for (Label label : labels) { | |
| // The configuration must be the configuration after the first transition step (applying | |
| // split configurations). The proper configuration (null) for package groups will be set | |
| // later. | |
| result.put(attribute, LabelAndConfiguration.of(label, configuration)); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| private void resolveExplicitAttributes(Rule rule, final BuildConfiguration configuration, | |
| AttributeMap attributes, | |
| final ImmutableSortedKeyListMultimap.Builder<Attribute, LabelAndConfiguration> builder) { | |
| attributes.visitLabels( | |
| new AttributeMap.AcceptsLabelAttribute() { | |
| @Override | |
| public void acceptLabelAttribute(Label label, Attribute attribute) { | |
| String attributeName = attribute.getName(); | |
| if (attributeName.equals("abi_deps")) { | |
| // abi_deps is handled specially: we visit only the branch that | |
| // needs to be taken based on the configuration. | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| if (attribute.getType() == Type.NODEP_LABEL) { | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| if (attribute.isImplicit() || attribute.isLateBound()) { | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| builder.put(attribute, LabelAndConfiguration.of(label, configuration)); | |
| } | |
| }); | |
| // TODO(bazel-team): Remove this in favor of the new configurable attributes. | |
| if (attributes.getAttributeDefinition("abi_deps") != null) { | |
| Attribute depsAttribute = attributes.getAttributeDefinition("deps"); | |
| MakeVariableExpander.Context context = new ConfigurationMakeVariableContext( | |
| rule.getPackage(), configuration); | |
| String abi = null; | |
| try { | |
| abi = MakeVariableExpander.expand(attributes.get("abi", Type.STRING), context); | |
| } catch (MakeVariableExpander.ExpansionException e) { | |
| // Ignore this. It will be handled during the analysis phase. | |
| } | |
| if (abi != null) { | |
| for (Map.Entry<String, List<Label>> entry | |
| : attributes.get("abi_deps", Type.LABEL_LIST_DICT).entrySet()) { | |
| try { | |
| if (Pattern.matches(entry.getKey(), abi)) { | |
| for (Label label : entry.getValue()) { | |
| builder.put(depsAttribute, LabelAndConfiguration.of(label, configuration)); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } catch (PatternSyntaxException e) { | |
| // Ignore this. It will be handled during the analysis phase. | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| private void resolveImplicitAttributes(Rule rule, BuildConfiguration configuration, | |
| AttributeMap attributeMap, Iterable<Attribute> attributes, | |
| ImmutableSortedKeyListMultimap.Builder<Attribute, LabelAndConfiguration> builder) { | |
| // Since the attributes that come from aspects do not appear in attributeMap, we have to get | |
| // their values from somewhere else. This incidentally means that aspects attributes are not | |
| // configurable. It would be nice if that wasn't the case, but we'd have to revamp how | |
| // attribute mapping works, which is a large chunk of work. | |
| ImmutableSet<String> mappedAttributes = ImmutableSet.copyOf(attributeMap.getAttributeNames()); | |
| for (Attribute attribute : attributes) { | |
| if (!attribute.isImplicit() || !attribute.getCondition().apply(attributeMap)) { | |
| continue; | |
| } | |
| if (attribute.getType() == Type.LABEL) { | |
| Label label = mappedAttributes.contains(attribute.getName()) | |
| ? attributeMap.get(attribute.getName(), Type.LABEL) | |
| : Type.LABEL.cast(attribute.getDefaultValue(rule)); | |
| if (label != null) { | |
| builder.put(attribute, LabelAndConfiguration.of(label, configuration)); | |
| } | |
| } else if (attribute.getType() == Type.LABEL_LIST) { | |
| List<Label> labelList = mappedAttributes.contains(attribute.getName()) | |
| ? attributeMap.get(attribute.getName(), Type.LABEL_LIST) | |
| : Type.LABEL_LIST.cast(attribute.getDefaultValue(rule)); | |
| for (Label label : labelList) { | |
| builder.put(attribute, LabelAndConfiguration.of(label, configuration)); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| private void resolveLateBoundAttributes(Rule rule, BuildConfiguration configuration, | |
| AttributeMap attributeMap, Iterable<Attribute> attributes, | |
| ImmutableSortedKeyListMultimap.Builder<Attribute, LabelAndConfiguration> builder) | |
| throws EvalException { | |
| for (Attribute attribute : attributes) { | |
| if (!attribute.isLateBound() || !attribute.getCondition().apply(attributeMap)) { | |
| continue; | |
| } | |
| List<BuildConfiguration> actualConfigurations = ImmutableList.of(configuration); | |
| if (attribute.getConfigurationTransition() instanceof SplitTransition<?>) { | |
| Preconditions.checkState(attribute.getConfigurator() == null); | |
| // TODO(bazel-team): This ends up applying the split transition twice, both here and in the | |
| // visitRule method below - this is not currently a problem, because the configuration graph | |
| // never contains nested split transitions, so the second application is idempotent. | |
| actualConfigurations = configuration.getSplitConfigurations( | |
| (SplitTransition<?>) attribute.getConfigurationTransition()); | |
| } | |
| for (BuildConfiguration actualConfig : actualConfigurations) { | |
| @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") | |
| LateBoundDefault<BuildConfiguration> lateBoundDefault = | |
| (LateBoundDefault<BuildConfiguration>) attribute.getLateBoundDefault(); | |
| if (lateBoundDefault.useHostConfiguration()) { | |
| actualConfig = | |
| actualConfig.getConfiguration(ConfigurationTransition.HOST); | |
| } | |
| // TODO(bazel-team): This might be too expensive - can we cache this somehow? | |
| if (!lateBoundDefault.getRequiredConfigurationFragments().isEmpty()) { | |
| if (!actualConfig.hasAllFragments(lateBoundDefault.getRequiredConfigurationFragments())) { | |
| continue; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| // TODO(bazel-team): We should check if the implementation tries to access an undeclared | |
| // fragment. | |
| Object actualValue = lateBoundDefault.getDefault(rule, actualConfig); | |
| if (attribute.getType() == Type.LABEL) { | |
| Label label; | |
| label = Type.LABEL.cast(actualValue); | |
| if (label != null) { | |
| builder.put(attribute, LabelAndConfiguration.of(label, actualConfig)); | |
| } | |
| } else if (attribute.getType() == Type.LABEL_LIST) { | |
| for (Label label : Type.LABEL_LIST.cast(actualValue)) { | |
| builder.put(attribute, LabelAndConfiguration.of(label, actualConfig)); | |
| } | |
| } else { | |
| throw new IllegalStateException(String.format( | |
| "Late bound attribute '%s' is not a label or a label list", attribute.getName())); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| /** | |
| * A variant of {@link #dependentNodeMap} that only returns the values of the resulting map, and | |
| * also converts any internally thrown {@link EvalException} instances into {@link | |
| * IllegalStateException}. | |
| */ | |
| public final Collection<Dependency> dependentNodes( | |
| TargetAndConfiguration node, Set<ConfigMatchingProvider> configConditions) { | |
| try { | |
| return dependentNodeMap(node, null, configConditions).values(); | |
| } catch (EvalException e) { | |
| throw new IllegalStateException(e); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| /** | |
| * Converts the given multimap of attributes to labels into a multi map of attributes to | |
| * {@link Dependency} objects using the proper configuration transition for each attribute. | |
| * | |
| * @throws IllegalArgumentException if the {@code node} does not refer to a {@link Rule} instance | |
| */ | |
| public final Collection<Dependency> resolveRuleLabels( | |
| TargetAndConfiguration node, AspectDefinition aspect, ListMultimap<Attribute, | |
| LabelAndConfiguration> labelMap) { | |
| Preconditions.checkArgument(node.getTarget() instanceof Rule); | |
| Rule rule = (Rule) node.getTarget(); | |
| ListMultimap<Attribute, Dependency> outgoingEdges = ArrayListMultimap.create(); | |
| visitRule(rule, aspect, labelMap, outgoingEdges); | |
| return outgoingEdges.values(); | |
| } | |
| private void visitPackageGroup(TargetAndConfiguration node, PackageGroup packageGroup, | |
| Collection<Dependency> outgoingEdges) { | |
| for (Label label : packageGroup.getIncludes()) { | |
| try { | |
| Target target = getTarget(label); | |
| if (target == null) { | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| if (!(target instanceof PackageGroup)) { | |
| // Note that this error could also be caught in PackageGroupConfiguredTarget, but since | |
| // these have the null configuration, visiting the corresponding target would trigger an | |
| // analysis of a rule with a null configuration, which doesn't work. | |
| invalidPackageGroupReferenceHook(node, label); | |
| continue; | |
| } | |
| outgoingEdges.add(new Dependency(label, node.getConfiguration())); | |
| } catch (NoSuchThingException e) { | |
| // Don't visit targets that don't exist (--keep_going) | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| private ImmutableSet<Class<? extends ConfiguredAspectFactory>> requiredAspects( | |
| AspectDefinition aspect, Attribute attribute, Target target) { | |
| if (!(target instanceof Rule)) { | |
| return ImmutableSet.of(); | |
| } | |
| RuleClass ruleClass = ((Rule) target).getRuleClassObject(); | |
| // The order of this set will be deterministic. This is necessary because this order eventually | |
| // influences the order in which aspects are merged into the main configured target, which in | |
| // turn influences which aspect takes precedence if two emit the same provider (maybe this | |
| // should be an error) | |
| Set<Class<? extends AspectFactory<?, ?, ?>>> aspectCandidates = new LinkedHashSet<>(); | |
| aspectCandidates.addAll(attribute.getAspects()); | |
| if (aspect != null) { | |
| aspectCandidates.addAll(aspect.getAttributeAspects().get(attribute.getName())); | |
| } | |
| ImmutableSet.Builder<Class<? extends ConfiguredAspectFactory>> result = ImmutableSet.builder(); | |
| for (Class<? extends AspectFactory<?, ?, ?>> candidateClass : aspectCandidates) { | |
| ConfiguredAspectFactory candidate = | |
| (ConfiguredAspectFactory) AspectFactory.Util.create(candidateClass); | |
| if (Sets.difference( | |
| candidate.getDefinition().getRequiredProviders(), | |
| ruleClass.getAdvertisedProviders()).isEmpty()) { | |
| result.add(candidateClass.asSubclass(ConfiguredAspectFactory.class)); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| return result.build(); | |
| } | |
| private void visitRule(Rule rule, AspectDefinition aspect, | |
| ListMultimap<Attribute, LabelAndConfiguration> labelMap, | |
| ListMultimap<Attribute, Dependency> outgoingEdges) { | |
| Preconditions.checkNotNull(labelMap); | |
| for (Map.Entry<Attribute, Collection<LabelAndConfiguration>> entry : | |
| labelMap.asMap().entrySet()) { | |
| Attribute attribute = entry.getKey(); | |
| for (LabelAndConfiguration dep : entry.getValue()) { | |
| Label label = dep.getLabel(); | |
| BuildConfiguration config = dep.getConfiguration(); | |
| Target toTarget; | |
| try { | |
| toTarget = getTarget(label); | |
| } catch (NoSuchThingException e) { | |
| throw new IllegalStateException("not found: " + label + " from " + rule + " in " | |
| + attribute.getName()); | |
| } | |
| if (toTarget == null) { | |
| continue; | |
| } | |
| Iterable<BuildConfiguration> toConfigurations = config.evaluateTransition( | |
| rule, attribute, toTarget); | |
| for (BuildConfiguration toConfiguration : toConfigurations) { | |
| outgoingEdges.put( | |
| entry.getKey(), | |
| new Dependency(label, toConfiguration, requiredAspects(aspect, attribute, toTarget))); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| private void visitTargetVisibility(TargetAndConfiguration node, | |
| Collection<Dependency> outgoingEdges) { | |
| for (Label label : node.getTarget().getVisibility().getDependencyLabels()) { | |
| try { | |
| Target visibilityTarget = getTarget(label); | |
| if (visibilityTarget == null) { | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| if (!(visibilityTarget instanceof PackageGroup)) { | |
| // Note that this error could also be caught in | |
| // AbstractConfiguredTarget.convertVisibility(), but we have an | |
| // opportunity here to avoid dependency cycles that result from | |
| // the visibility attribute of a rule referring to a rule that | |
| // depends on it (instead of its package) | |
| invalidVisibilityReferenceHook(node, label); | |
| continue; | |
| } | |
| // Visibility always has null configuration | |
| outgoingEdges.add(new Dependency(label, null)); | |
| } catch (NoSuchThingException e) { | |
| // Don't visit targets that don't exist (--keep_going) | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| /** | |
| * Hook for the error case when an invalid visibility reference is found. | |
| * | |
| * @param node the node with the visibility attribute | |
| * @param label the invalid visibility reference | |
| */ | |
| protected abstract void invalidVisibilityReferenceHook(TargetAndConfiguration node, Label label); | |
| /** | |
| * Hook for the error case when an invalid package group reference is found. | |
| * | |
| * @param node the package group node with the includes attribute | |
| * @param label the invalid reference | |
| */ | |
| protected abstract void invalidPackageGroupReferenceHook(TargetAndConfiguration node, | |
| Label label); | |
| /** | |
| * Returns the target by the given label. | |
| * | |
| * <p>Throws {@link NoSuchThingException} if the target is known not to exist. | |
| * | |
| * <p>Returns null if the target is not ready to be returned at this moment. If getTarget returns | |
| * null once or more during a {@link #dependentNodeMap} call, the results of that call will be | |
| * incomplete. For use within Skyframe, where several iterations may be needed to discover | |
| * all dependencies. | |
| */ | |
| @Nullable | |
| protected abstract Target getTarget(Label label) throws NoSuchThingException; | |
| } |