| // Copyright 2017 The Bazel Authors. All rights reserved. | |
| // | |
| // Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); | |
| // you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. | |
| // You may obtain a copy of the License at | |
| // | |
| // http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 | |
| // | |
| // Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software | |
| // distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, | |
| // WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. | |
| // See the License for the specific language governing permissions and | |
| // limitations under the License. | |
| package com.google.devtools.common.options; | |
| import static com.google.common.truth.Truth.assertThat; | |
| import static org.junit.Assert.assertThrows; | |
| import com.google.common.collect.ImmutableList; | |
| import com.google.common.truth.Correspondence; | |
| import com.google.devtools.common.options.OptionsParser.ConstructionException; | |
| import java.util.ArrayList; | |
| import java.util.List; | |
| import java.util.Map; | |
| import org.junit.Test; | |
| import org.junit.runner.RunWith; | |
| import org.junit.runners.JUnit4; | |
| /** Tests for {@link IsolatedOptionsData} and {@link OptionsData}. */ | |
| @RunWith(JUnit4.class) | |
| public class OptionsDataTest { | |
| private static IsolatedOptionsData construct(Class<? extends OptionsBase> optionsClass) | |
| throws OptionsParser.ConstructionException { | |
| return IsolatedOptionsData.from( | |
| ImmutableList.of(optionsClass), /* allowDuplicatesParsingEquivalently= */ false); | |
| } | |
| private static IsolatedOptionsData construct( | |
| Class<? extends OptionsBase> optionsClass1, | |
| Class<? extends OptionsBase> optionsClass2) | |
| throws OptionsParser.ConstructionException { | |
| return IsolatedOptionsData.from( | |
| ImmutableList.of(optionsClass1, optionsClass2), | |
| /* allowDuplicatesParsingEquivalently= */ false); | |
| } | |
| private static IsolatedOptionsData construct( | |
| Class<? extends OptionsBase> optionsClass1, | |
| Class<? extends OptionsBase> optionsClass2, | |
| Class<? extends OptionsBase> optionsClass3) | |
| throws OptionsParser.ConstructionException { | |
| return IsolatedOptionsData.from( | |
| ImmutableList.of(optionsClass1, optionsClass2, optionsClass3), | |
| /* allowDuplicatesParsingEquivalently= */ false); | |
| } | |
| /** Dummy options class. */ | |
| public static class ExampleNameConflictOptions extends OptionsBase { | |
| @Option( | |
| name = "foo", | |
| documentationCategory = OptionDocumentationCategory.UNCATEGORIZED, | |
| effectTags = {OptionEffectTag.NO_OP}, | |
| defaultValue = "1" | |
| ) | |
| public int foo; | |
| @Option( | |
| name = "foo", | |
| documentationCategory = OptionDocumentationCategory.UNCATEGORIZED, | |
| effectTags = {OptionEffectTag.NO_OP}, | |
| defaultValue = "I should conflict with foo" | |
| ) | |
| public String anotherFoo; | |
| } | |
| @Test | |
| public void testNameConflictInSingleClass() { | |
| ConstructionException e = | |
| assertThrows( | |
| "foo should conflict with the previous flag foo", | |
| ConstructionException.class, | |
| () -> construct(ExampleNameConflictOptions.class)); | |
| assertThat(e).hasCauseThat().isInstanceOf(DuplicateOptionDeclarationException.class); | |
| assertThat(e) | |
| .hasMessageThat() | |
| .contains("Duplicate option name, due to option name collision: --foo"); | |
| } | |
| /** Dummy options class. */ | |
| public static class ExampleIntegerFooOptions extends OptionsBase { | |
| @Option( | |
| name = "foo", | |
| documentationCategory = OptionDocumentationCategory.UNCATEGORIZED, | |
| effectTags = {OptionEffectTag.NO_OP}, | |
| defaultValue = "5" | |
| ) | |
| public int foo; | |
| } | |
| /** Dummy options class. */ | |
| public static class ExampleBooleanFooOptions extends OptionsBase { | |
| @Option( | |
| name = "foo", | |
| documentationCategory = OptionDocumentationCategory.UNCATEGORIZED, | |
| effectTags = {OptionEffectTag.NO_OP}, | |
| defaultValue = "false" | |
| ) | |
| public boolean foo; | |
| } | |
| @Test | |
| public void testNameConflictInTwoClasses() { | |
| ConstructionException e = | |
| assertThrows( | |
| "foo should conflict with the previous flag foo", | |
| ConstructionException.class, | |
| () -> construct(ExampleIntegerFooOptions.class, ExampleBooleanFooOptions.class)); | |
| assertThat(e).hasCauseThat().isInstanceOf(DuplicateOptionDeclarationException.class); | |
| assertThat(e) | |
| .hasMessageThat() | |
| .contains("Duplicate option name, due to option name collision: --foo"); | |
| } | |
| /** Dummy options class. */ | |
| public static class ExamplePrefixedFooOptions extends OptionsBase { | |
| @Option( | |
| name = "nofoo", | |
| documentationCategory = OptionDocumentationCategory.UNCATEGORIZED, | |
| effectTags = {OptionEffectTag.NO_OP}, | |
| defaultValue = "false" | |
| ) | |
| public boolean noFoo; | |
| } | |
| @Test | |
| public void testBooleanPrefixNameConflict() { | |
| // Try the same test in both orders, the parser should fail if the overlapping flag is defined | |
| // before or after the boolean flag introduces the alias. | |
| ConstructionException e = | |
| assertThrows( | |
| "nofoo should conflict with the previous flag foo, " | |
| + "since foo, as a boolean flag, can be written as --nofoo", | |
| ConstructionException.class, | |
| () -> construct(ExampleBooleanFooOptions.class, ExamplePrefixedFooOptions.class)); | |
| assertThat(e).hasCauseThat().isInstanceOf(DuplicateOptionDeclarationException.class); | |
| assertThat(e) | |
| .hasMessageThat() | |
| .contains( | |
| "Duplicate option name, due to option --nofoo, it " | |
| + "conflicts with a negating alias for boolean flag --foo"); | |
| e = | |
| assertThrows( | |
| "option nofoo should conflict with the previous flag foo, " | |
| + "since foo, as a boolean flag, can be written as --nofoo", | |
| ConstructionException.class, | |
| () -> construct(ExamplePrefixedFooOptions.class, ExampleBooleanFooOptions.class)); | |
| assertThat(e).hasCauseThat().isInstanceOf(DuplicateOptionDeclarationException.class); | |
| assertThat(e) | |
| .hasMessageThat() | |
| .contains("Duplicate option name, due to boolean option alias: --nofoo"); | |
| } | |
| /** Dummy options class. */ | |
| public static class ExampleBarWasNamedFooOption extends OptionsBase { | |
| @Option( | |
| name = "bar", | |
| oldName = "foo", | |
| documentationCategory = OptionDocumentationCategory.UNCATEGORIZED, | |
| effectTags = {OptionEffectTag.NO_OP}, | |
| defaultValue = "false" | |
| ) | |
| public boolean bar; | |
| } | |
| @Test | |
| public void testBooleanAliasWithOldNameConflict() { | |
| // Try the same test in both orders, the parser should fail if the overlapping flag is defined | |
| // before or after the boolean flag introduces the alias. | |
| ConstructionException e = | |
| assertThrows( | |
| "bar has old name foo, which is a boolean flag and can be named as nofoo, so it " | |
| + "should conflict with the previous option --nofoo", | |
| ConstructionException.class, | |
| () -> construct(ExamplePrefixedFooOptions.class, ExampleBarWasNamedFooOption.class)); | |
| assertThat(e).hasCauseThat().isInstanceOf(DuplicateOptionDeclarationException.class); | |
| assertThat(e) | |
| .hasMessageThat() | |
| .contains("Duplicate option name, due to boolean option alias: --nofoo"); | |
| e = | |
| assertThrows( | |
| "nofoo should conflict with the previous flag bar that has old name foo, " | |
| + "since foo, as a boolean flag, can be written as --nofoo", | |
| ConstructionException.class, | |
| () -> construct(ExampleBarWasNamedFooOption.class, ExamplePrefixedFooOptions.class)); | |
| assertThat(e).hasCauseThat().isInstanceOf(DuplicateOptionDeclarationException.class); | |
| assertThat(e) | |
| .hasMessageThat() | |
| .contains( | |
| "Duplicate option name, due to option --nofoo, it conflicts with a negating " | |
| + "alias for boolean flag --foo"); | |
| } | |
| /** Dummy options class. */ | |
| public static class ExampleBarWasNamedNoFooOption extends OptionsBase { | |
| @Option( | |
| name = "bar", | |
| oldName = "nofoo", | |
| documentationCategory = OptionDocumentationCategory.UNCATEGORIZED, | |
| effectTags = {OptionEffectTag.NO_OP}, | |
| defaultValue = "false" | |
| ) | |
| public boolean bar; | |
| } | |
| @Test | |
| public void testBooleanWithOldNameAsAliasOfBooleanConflict() { | |
| // Try the same test in both orders, the parser should fail if the overlapping flag is defined | |
| // before or after the boolean flag introduces the alias. | |
| ConstructionException e = | |
| assertThrows( | |
| "nofoo, the old name for bar, should conflict with the previous flag foo, " | |
| + "since foo, as a boolean flag, can be written as --nofoo", | |
| ConstructionException.class, | |
| () -> construct(ExampleBooleanFooOptions.class, ExampleBarWasNamedNoFooOption.class)); | |
| assertThat(e).hasCauseThat().isInstanceOf(DuplicateOptionDeclarationException.class); | |
| assertThat(e) | |
| .hasMessageThat() | |
| .contains( | |
| "Duplicate option name, due to old option name --nofoo, it conflicts with a " | |
| + "negating alias for boolean flag --foo"); | |
| e = | |
| assertThrows( | |
| "foo, as a boolean flag, can be written as --nofoo and should conflict with the " | |
| + "previous option bar that has old name nofoo", | |
| ConstructionException.class, | |
| () -> construct(ExampleBarWasNamedNoFooOption.class, ExampleBooleanFooOptions.class)); | |
| assertThat(e).hasCauseThat().isInstanceOf(DuplicateOptionDeclarationException.class); | |
| assertThat(e) | |
| .hasMessageThat() | |
| .contains("Duplicate option name, due to boolean option alias: --nofoo"); | |
| } | |
| /** Dummy options class. */ | |
| public static class ExampleFooBooleanConflictsWithOwnOldName extends OptionsBase { | |
| @Option( | |
| name = "nofoo", | |
| oldName = "foo", | |
| documentationCategory = OptionDocumentationCategory.UNCATEGORIZED, | |
| effectTags = {OptionEffectTag.NO_OP}, | |
| defaultValue = "false" | |
| ) | |
| public boolean foo; | |
| } | |
| @Test | |
| public void testSelfConflictBooleanAliases() { | |
| // Try the same test in both orders, the parser should fail if the overlapping flag is defined | |
| // before or after the boolean flag introduces the alias. | |
| ConstructionException e = | |
| assertThrows( | |
| "foo, the old name for boolean option nofoo, should conflict with its own new name.", | |
| ConstructionException.class, | |
| () -> construct(ExampleFooBooleanConflictsWithOwnOldName.class)); | |
| assertThat(e).hasCauseThat().isInstanceOf(DuplicateOptionDeclarationException.class); | |
| assertThat(e) | |
| .hasMessageThat() | |
| .contains("Duplicate option name, due to boolean option alias: --nofoo"); | |
| } | |
| /** Dummy options class. */ | |
| public static class OldNameToCanonicalNameConflictExample extends OptionsBase { | |
| @Option( | |
| name = "new_name", | |
| oldName = "old_name", | |
| documentationCategory = OptionDocumentationCategory.UNCATEGORIZED, | |
| effectTags = {OptionEffectTag.NO_OP}, | |
| defaultValue = "defaultValue" | |
| ) | |
| public String flag1; | |
| @Option( | |
| name = "old_name", | |
| documentationCategory = OptionDocumentationCategory.UNCATEGORIZED, | |
| effectTags = {OptionEffectTag.NO_OP}, | |
| defaultValue = "defaultValue" | |
| ) | |
| public String flag2; | |
| } | |
| @Test | |
| public void testOldNameToCanonicalNameConflict() { | |
| ConstructionException expected = | |
| assertThrows( | |
| "old_name should conflict with the flag already named old_name", | |
| ConstructionException.class, | |
| () -> construct(OldNameToCanonicalNameConflictExample.class)); | |
| assertThat(expected).hasCauseThat().isInstanceOf(DuplicateOptionDeclarationException.class); | |
| assertThat(expected) | |
| .hasMessageThat() | |
| .contains( | |
| "Duplicate option name, due to option name collision with another option's old name:" | |
| + " --old_name"); | |
| } | |
| /** Dummy options class. */ | |
| public static class OldNameConflictExample extends OptionsBase { | |
| @Option( | |
| name = "new_name", | |
| oldName = "old_name", | |
| documentationCategory = OptionDocumentationCategory.UNCATEGORIZED, | |
| effectTags = {OptionEffectTag.NO_OP}, | |
| defaultValue = "defaultValue" | |
| ) | |
| public String flag1; | |
| @Option( | |
| name = "another_name", | |
| oldName = "old_name", | |
| documentationCategory = OptionDocumentationCategory.UNCATEGORIZED, | |
| effectTags = {OptionEffectTag.NO_OP}, | |
| defaultValue = "defaultValue" | |
| ) | |
| public String flag2; | |
| } | |
| @Test | |
| public void testOldNameToOldNameConflict() { | |
| ConstructionException expected = | |
| assertThrows( | |
| "old_name should conflict with the flag already named old_name", | |
| ConstructionException.class, | |
| () -> construct(OldNameConflictExample.class)); | |
| assertThat(expected).hasCauseThat().isInstanceOf(DuplicateOptionDeclarationException.class); | |
| assertThat(expected) | |
| .hasMessageThat() | |
| .contains( | |
| "Duplicate option name, due to old option name collision with another " | |
| + "old option name: --old_name"); | |
| } | |
| /** Dummy options class. */ | |
| public static class StringConverter extends Converter.Contextless<String> { | |
| @Override | |
| public String convert(String input) { | |
| return input; | |
| } | |
| @Override | |
| public String getTypeDescription() { | |
| return "a string"; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| /** | |
| * Dummy options class. | |
| * | |
| * <p>Option name order is different from field name order. | |
| * | |
| * <p>There are four fields to increase the likelihood of a non-deterministic order being noticed. | |
| */ | |
| public static class FieldNamesDifferOptions extends OptionsBase { | |
| @Option( | |
| name = "foo", | |
| documentationCategory = OptionDocumentationCategory.UNCATEGORIZED, | |
| effectTags = {OptionEffectTag.NO_OP}, | |
| defaultValue = "0" | |
| ) | |
| public int aFoo; | |
| @Option( | |
| name = "bar", | |
| documentationCategory = OptionDocumentationCategory.UNCATEGORIZED, | |
| effectTags = {OptionEffectTag.NO_OP}, | |
| defaultValue = "0" | |
| ) | |
| public int bBar; | |
| @Option( | |
| name = "baz", | |
| documentationCategory = OptionDocumentationCategory.UNCATEGORIZED, | |
| effectTags = {OptionEffectTag.NO_OP}, | |
| defaultValue = "0" | |
| ) | |
| public int cBaz; | |
| @Option( | |
| name = "qux", | |
| documentationCategory = OptionDocumentationCategory.UNCATEGORIZED, | |
| effectTags = {OptionEffectTag.NO_OP}, | |
| defaultValue = "0" | |
| ) | |
| public int dQux; | |
| } | |
| /** Dummy options class. */ | |
| public static class EndOfAlphabetOptions extends OptionsBase { | |
| @Option( | |
| name = "X", | |
| documentationCategory = OptionDocumentationCategory.UNCATEGORIZED, | |
| effectTags = {OptionEffectTag.NO_OP}, | |
| defaultValue = "0" | |
| ) | |
| public int x; | |
| @Option( | |
| name = "Y", | |
| documentationCategory = OptionDocumentationCategory.UNCATEGORIZED, | |
| effectTags = {OptionEffectTag.NO_OP}, | |
| defaultValue = "0" | |
| ) | |
| public int y; | |
| } | |
| /** Dummy options class. */ | |
| public static class ReverseOrderedOptions extends OptionsBase { | |
| @Option( | |
| name = "C", | |
| documentationCategory = OptionDocumentationCategory.UNCATEGORIZED, | |
| effectTags = {OptionEffectTag.NO_OP}, | |
| defaultValue = "0" | |
| ) | |
| public int c; | |
| @Option( | |
| name = "B", | |
| documentationCategory = OptionDocumentationCategory.UNCATEGORIZED, | |
| effectTags = {OptionEffectTag.NO_OP}, | |
| defaultValue = "0" | |
| ) | |
| public int b; | |
| @Option( | |
| name = "A", | |
| documentationCategory = OptionDocumentationCategory.UNCATEGORIZED, | |
| effectTags = {OptionEffectTag.NO_OP}, | |
| defaultValue = "0" | |
| ) | |
| public int a; | |
| } | |
| @Test | |
| public void optionsClassesIsOrdered() throws Exception { | |
| IsolatedOptionsData data = construct( | |
| FieldNamesDifferOptions.class, | |
| EndOfAlphabetOptions.class, | |
| ReverseOrderedOptions.class); | |
| assertThat(data.getOptionsClasses()).containsExactly( | |
| FieldNamesDifferOptions.class, | |
| EndOfAlphabetOptions.class, | |
| ReverseOrderedOptions.class).inOrder(); | |
| } | |
| @Test | |
| public void getAllNamedFieldsIsOrdered() throws Exception { | |
| IsolatedOptionsData data = construct( | |
| FieldNamesDifferOptions.class, | |
| EndOfAlphabetOptions.class, | |
| ReverseOrderedOptions.class); | |
| ArrayList<String> names = new ArrayList<>(); | |
| for (Map.Entry<String, OptionDefinition> entry : data.getAllOptionDefinitions()) { | |
| names.add(entry.getKey()); | |
| } | |
| assertThat(names).containsExactly( | |
| "bar", "baz", "foo", "qux", "X", "Y", "A", "B", "C").inOrder(); | |
| } | |
| private List<String> getOptionNames(Class<? extends OptionsBase> optionsBase) { | |
| ArrayList<String> result = new ArrayList<>(); | |
| for (OptionDefinition optionDefinition : | |
| OptionsData.getAllOptionDefinitionsForClass(optionsBase)) { | |
| result.add(optionDefinition.getOptionName()); | |
| } | |
| return result; | |
| } | |
| @Test | |
| public void getFieldsForClassIsOrdered() throws Exception { | |
| assertThat(getOptionNames(FieldNamesDifferOptions.class)) | |
| .containsExactly("bar", "baz", "foo", "qux") | |
| .inOrder(); | |
| assertThat(getOptionNames(EndOfAlphabetOptions.class)).containsExactly("X", "Y").inOrder(); | |
| assertThat(getOptionNames(ReverseOrderedOptions.class)) | |
| .containsExactly("A", "B", "C") | |
| .inOrder(); | |
| } | |
| @Test | |
| public void optionsDefinitionsAreSharedBetweenOptionsBases() throws Exception { | |
| Class<FieldNamesDifferOptions> class1 = FieldNamesDifferOptions.class; | |
| Class<EndOfAlphabetOptions> class2 = EndOfAlphabetOptions.class; | |
| Class<ReverseOrderedOptions> class3 = ReverseOrderedOptions.class; | |
| // Construct the definitions once and accumulate them so we can test that these are not | |
| // recomputed during the construction of the options data. | |
| ImmutableList<OptionDefinition> optionDefinitions = | |
| new ImmutableList.Builder<OptionDefinition>() | |
| .addAll(OptionsData.getAllOptionDefinitionsForClass(class1)) | |
| .addAll(OptionsData.getAllOptionDefinitionsForClass(class2)) | |
| .addAll(OptionsData.getAllOptionDefinitionsForClass(class3)) | |
| .build(); | |
| // Construct the data all together. | |
| IsolatedOptionsData data = construct(class1, class2, class3); | |
| ArrayList<OptionDefinition> optionDefinitionsFromData = | |
| new ArrayList<>(optionDefinitions.size()); | |
| data.getAllOptionDefinitions() | |
| .forEach(entry -> optionDefinitionsFromData.add(entry.getValue())); | |
| Correspondence<Object, Object> referenceEquality = | |
| Correspondence.from((obj1, obj2) -> obj1 == obj2, "is the same object as"); | |
| assertThat(optionDefinitionsFromData) | |
| .comparingElementsUsing(referenceEquality) | |
| .containsAtLeastElementsIn(optionDefinitions); | |
| // Construct options data for each class separately, and check again. | |
| IsolatedOptionsData data1 = construct(class1); | |
| IsolatedOptionsData data2 = construct(class2); | |
| IsolatedOptionsData data3 = construct(class3); | |
| ArrayList<OptionDefinition> optionDefinitionsFromGroupedData = | |
| new ArrayList<>(optionDefinitions.size()); | |
| data1 | |
| .getAllOptionDefinitions() | |
| .forEach(entry -> optionDefinitionsFromGroupedData.add(entry.getValue())); | |
| data2 | |
| .getAllOptionDefinitions() | |
| .forEach(entry -> optionDefinitionsFromGroupedData.add(entry.getValue())); | |
| data3 | |
| .getAllOptionDefinitions() | |
| .forEach(entry -> optionDefinitionsFromGroupedData.add(entry.getValue())); | |
| assertThat(optionDefinitionsFromGroupedData) | |
| .comparingElementsUsing(referenceEquality) | |
| .containsAtLeastElementsIn(optionDefinitions); | |
| } | |
| /** Dummy options class. */ | |
| public static class ValidExpansionOptions extends OptionsBase { | |
| @Option( | |
| name = "foo", | |
| documentationCategory = OptionDocumentationCategory.UNCATEGORIZED, | |
| effectTags = {OptionEffectTag.NO_OP}, | |
| defaultValue = "1" | |
| ) | |
| public int foo; | |
| @Option( | |
| name = "bar", | |
| documentationCategory = OptionDocumentationCategory.UNCATEGORIZED, | |
| effectTags = {OptionEffectTag.NO_OP}, | |
| defaultValue = "null", | |
| expansion = {"--foo=42"} | |
| ) | |
| public Void bar; | |
| } | |
| @Test | |
| public void staticExpansionOptionsCanBeVoidType() { | |
| construct(ValidExpansionOptions.class); | |
| } | |
| } |