|  | // Copyright 2017 The Bazel Authors. All rights reserved. | 
|  | // | 
|  | // Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); | 
|  | // you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. | 
|  | // You may obtain a copy of the License at | 
|  | // | 
|  | //    http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 | 
|  | // | 
|  | // Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software | 
|  | // distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, | 
|  | // WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. | 
|  | // See the License for the specific language governing permissions and | 
|  | // limitations under the License. | 
|  |  | 
|  | package com.google.devtools.common.options; | 
|  |  | 
|  | import static com.google.common.truth.Truth.assertThat; | 
|  | import static com.google.devtools.build.lib.testutil.MoreAsserts.assertThrows; | 
|  |  | 
|  | import com.google.common.collect.ImmutableList; | 
|  | import com.google.common.truth.Correspondence; | 
|  | import com.google.devtools.common.options.OptionsParser.ConstructionException; | 
|  | import java.util.ArrayList; | 
|  | import java.util.List; | 
|  | import java.util.Map; | 
|  | import org.junit.Test; | 
|  | import org.junit.runner.RunWith; | 
|  | import org.junit.runners.JUnit4; | 
|  |  | 
|  | /** Tests for {@link IsolatedOptionsData} and {@link OptionsData}. */ | 
|  | @RunWith(JUnit4.class) | 
|  | public class OptionsDataTest { | 
|  |  | 
|  | private static IsolatedOptionsData construct(Class<? extends OptionsBase> optionsClass) | 
|  | throws OptionsParser.ConstructionException { | 
|  | return IsolatedOptionsData.from(ImmutableList.<Class<? extends OptionsBase>>of(optionsClass)); | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | private static IsolatedOptionsData construct( | 
|  | Class<? extends OptionsBase> optionsClass1, | 
|  | Class<? extends OptionsBase> optionsClass2) | 
|  | throws OptionsParser.ConstructionException { | 
|  | return IsolatedOptionsData.from( | 
|  | ImmutableList.<Class<? extends OptionsBase>>of(optionsClass1, optionsClass2)); | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | private static IsolatedOptionsData construct( | 
|  | Class<? extends OptionsBase> optionsClass1, | 
|  | Class<? extends OptionsBase> optionsClass2, | 
|  | Class<? extends OptionsBase> optionsClass3) | 
|  | throws OptionsParser.ConstructionException { | 
|  | return IsolatedOptionsData.from( | 
|  | ImmutableList.<Class<? extends OptionsBase>>of( | 
|  | optionsClass1, optionsClass2, optionsClass3)); | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | /** Dummy options class. */ | 
|  | public static class ExampleNameConflictOptions extends OptionsBase { | 
|  | @Option( | 
|  | name = "foo", | 
|  | documentationCategory = OptionDocumentationCategory.UNCATEGORIZED, | 
|  | effectTags = {OptionEffectTag.NO_OP}, | 
|  | defaultValue = "1" | 
|  | ) | 
|  | public int foo; | 
|  |  | 
|  | @Option( | 
|  | name = "foo", | 
|  | documentationCategory = OptionDocumentationCategory.UNCATEGORIZED, | 
|  | effectTags = {OptionEffectTag.NO_OP}, | 
|  | defaultValue = "I should conflict with foo" | 
|  | ) | 
|  | public String anotherFoo; | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | @Test | 
|  | public void testNameConflictInSingleClass() { | 
|  | ConstructionException e = | 
|  | assertThrows( | 
|  | "foo should conflict with the previous flag foo", | 
|  | ConstructionException.class, | 
|  | () -> construct(ExampleNameConflictOptions.class)); | 
|  | assertThat(e).hasCauseThat().isInstanceOf(DuplicateOptionDeclarationException.class); | 
|  | assertThat(e) | 
|  | .hasMessageThat() | 
|  | .contains("Duplicate option name, due to option name collision: --foo"); | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | /** Dummy options class. */ | 
|  | public static class ExampleIntegerFooOptions extends OptionsBase { | 
|  | @Option( | 
|  | name = "foo", | 
|  | documentationCategory = OptionDocumentationCategory.UNCATEGORIZED, | 
|  | effectTags = {OptionEffectTag.NO_OP}, | 
|  | defaultValue = "5" | 
|  | ) | 
|  | public int foo; | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | /** Dummy options class. */ | 
|  | public static class ExampleBooleanFooOptions extends OptionsBase { | 
|  | @Option( | 
|  | name = "foo", | 
|  | documentationCategory = OptionDocumentationCategory.UNCATEGORIZED, | 
|  | effectTags = {OptionEffectTag.NO_OP}, | 
|  | defaultValue = "false" | 
|  | ) | 
|  | public boolean foo; | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | @Test | 
|  | public void testNameConflictInTwoClasses() { | 
|  | ConstructionException e = | 
|  | assertThrows( | 
|  | "foo should conflict with the previous flag foo", | 
|  | ConstructionException.class, | 
|  | () -> construct(ExampleIntegerFooOptions.class, ExampleBooleanFooOptions.class)); | 
|  | assertThat(e).hasCauseThat().isInstanceOf(DuplicateOptionDeclarationException.class); | 
|  | assertThat(e) | 
|  | .hasMessageThat() | 
|  | .contains("Duplicate option name, due to option name collision: --foo"); | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | /** Dummy options class. */ | 
|  | public static class ExamplePrefixedFooOptions extends OptionsBase { | 
|  | @Option( | 
|  | name = "nofoo", | 
|  | documentationCategory = OptionDocumentationCategory.UNCATEGORIZED, | 
|  | effectTags = {OptionEffectTag.NO_OP}, | 
|  | defaultValue = "false" | 
|  | ) | 
|  | public boolean noFoo; | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | @Test | 
|  | public void testBooleanPrefixNameConflict() { | 
|  | // Try the same test in both orders, the parser should fail if the overlapping flag is defined | 
|  | // before or after the boolean flag introduces the alias. | 
|  | ConstructionException e = | 
|  | assertThrows( | 
|  | "nofoo should conflict with the previous flag foo, " | 
|  | + "since foo, as a boolean flag, can be written as --nofoo", | 
|  | ConstructionException.class, | 
|  | () -> construct(ExampleBooleanFooOptions.class, ExamplePrefixedFooOptions.class)); | 
|  | assertThat(e).hasCauseThat().isInstanceOf(DuplicateOptionDeclarationException.class); | 
|  | assertThat(e) | 
|  | .hasMessageThat() | 
|  | .contains( | 
|  | "Duplicate option name, due to option --nofoo, it " | 
|  | + "conflicts with a negating alias for boolean flag --foo"); | 
|  |  | 
|  | e = | 
|  | assertThrows( | 
|  | "option nofoo should conflict with the previous flag foo, " | 
|  | + "since foo, as a boolean flag, can be written as --nofoo", | 
|  | ConstructionException.class, | 
|  | () -> construct(ExamplePrefixedFooOptions.class, ExampleBooleanFooOptions.class)); | 
|  | assertThat(e).hasCauseThat().isInstanceOf(DuplicateOptionDeclarationException.class); | 
|  | assertThat(e) | 
|  | .hasMessageThat() | 
|  | .contains("Duplicate option name, due to boolean option alias: --nofoo"); | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | /** Dummy options class. */ | 
|  | public static class ExampleBarWasNamedFooOption extends OptionsBase { | 
|  | @Option( | 
|  | name = "bar", | 
|  | oldName = "foo", | 
|  | documentationCategory = OptionDocumentationCategory.UNCATEGORIZED, | 
|  | effectTags = {OptionEffectTag.NO_OP}, | 
|  | defaultValue = "false" | 
|  | ) | 
|  | public boolean bar; | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | @Test | 
|  | public void testBooleanAliasWithOldNameConflict() { | 
|  | // Try the same test in both orders, the parser should fail if the overlapping flag is defined | 
|  | // before or after the boolean flag introduces the alias. | 
|  | ConstructionException e = | 
|  | assertThrows( | 
|  | "bar has old name foo, which is a boolean flag and can be named as nofoo, so it " | 
|  | + "should conflict with the previous option --nofoo", | 
|  | ConstructionException.class, | 
|  | () -> construct(ExamplePrefixedFooOptions.class, ExampleBarWasNamedFooOption.class)); | 
|  | assertThat(e).hasCauseThat().isInstanceOf(DuplicateOptionDeclarationException.class); | 
|  | assertThat(e) | 
|  | .hasMessageThat() | 
|  | .contains("Duplicate option name, due to boolean option alias: --nofoo"); | 
|  |  | 
|  | e = | 
|  | assertThrows( | 
|  | "nofoo should conflict with the previous flag bar that has old name foo, " | 
|  | + "since foo, as a boolean flag, can be written as --nofoo", | 
|  | ConstructionException.class, | 
|  | () -> construct(ExampleBarWasNamedFooOption.class, ExamplePrefixedFooOptions.class)); | 
|  | assertThat(e).hasCauseThat().isInstanceOf(DuplicateOptionDeclarationException.class); | 
|  | assertThat(e) | 
|  | .hasMessageThat() | 
|  | .contains( | 
|  | "Duplicate option name, due to option --nofoo, it conflicts with a negating " | 
|  | + "alias for boolean flag --foo"); | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | /** Dummy options class. */ | 
|  | public static class ExampleBarWasNamedNoFooOption extends OptionsBase { | 
|  | @Option( | 
|  | name = "bar", | 
|  | oldName = "nofoo", | 
|  | documentationCategory = OptionDocumentationCategory.UNCATEGORIZED, | 
|  | effectTags = {OptionEffectTag.NO_OP}, | 
|  | defaultValue = "false" | 
|  | ) | 
|  | public boolean bar; | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | @Test | 
|  | public void testBooleanWithOldNameAsAliasOfBooleanConflict() { | 
|  | // Try the same test in both orders, the parser should fail if the overlapping flag is defined | 
|  | // before or after the boolean flag introduces the alias. | 
|  | ConstructionException e = | 
|  | assertThrows( | 
|  | "nofoo, the old name for bar, should conflict with the previous flag foo, " | 
|  | + "since foo, as a boolean flag, can be written as --nofoo", | 
|  | ConstructionException.class, | 
|  | () -> construct(ExampleBooleanFooOptions.class, ExampleBarWasNamedNoFooOption.class)); | 
|  | assertThat(e).hasCauseThat().isInstanceOf(DuplicateOptionDeclarationException.class); | 
|  | assertThat(e) | 
|  | .hasMessageThat() | 
|  | .contains( | 
|  | "Duplicate option name, due to old option name --nofoo, it conflicts with a " | 
|  | + "negating alias for boolean flag --foo"); | 
|  |  | 
|  | e = | 
|  | assertThrows( | 
|  | "foo, as a boolean flag, can be written as --nofoo and should conflict with the " | 
|  | + "previous option bar that has old name nofoo", | 
|  | ConstructionException.class, | 
|  | () -> construct(ExampleBarWasNamedNoFooOption.class, ExampleBooleanFooOptions.class)); | 
|  | assertThat(e).hasCauseThat().isInstanceOf(DuplicateOptionDeclarationException.class); | 
|  | assertThat(e) | 
|  | .hasMessageThat() | 
|  | .contains("Duplicate option name, due to boolean option alias: --nofoo"); | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | /** Dummy options class. */ | 
|  | public static class ExampleFooBooleanConflictsWithOwnOldName extends OptionsBase { | 
|  | @Option( | 
|  | name = "nofoo", | 
|  | oldName = "foo", | 
|  | documentationCategory = OptionDocumentationCategory.UNCATEGORIZED, | 
|  | effectTags = {OptionEffectTag.NO_OP}, | 
|  | defaultValue = "false" | 
|  | ) | 
|  | public boolean foo; | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | @Test | 
|  | public void testSelfConflictBooleanAliases() { | 
|  | // Try the same test in both orders, the parser should fail if the overlapping flag is defined | 
|  | // before or after the boolean flag introduces the alias. | 
|  | ConstructionException e = | 
|  | assertThrows( | 
|  | "foo, the old name for boolean option nofoo, should conflict with its own new name.", | 
|  | ConstructionException.class, | 
|  | () -> construct(ExampleFooBooleanConflictsWithOwnOldName.class)); | 
|  | assertThat(e).hasCauseThat().isInstanceOf(DuplicateOptionDeclarationException.class); | 
|  | assertThat(e) | 
|  | .hasMessageThat() | 
|  | .contains("Duplicate option name, due to boolean option alias: --nofoo"); | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | /** Dummy options class. */ | 
|  | public static class OldNameToCanonicalNameConflictExample extends OptionsBase { | 
|  | @Option( | 
|  | name = "new_name", | 
|  | oldName = "old_name", | 
|  | documentationCategory = OptionDocumentationCategory.UNCATEGORIZED, | 
|  | effectTags = {OptionEffectTag.NO_OP}, | 
|  | defaultValue = "defaultValue" | 
|  | ) | 
|  | public String flag1; | 
|  |  | 
|  | @Option( | 
|  | name = "old_name", | 
|  | documentationCategory = OptionDocumentationCategory.UNCATEGORIZED, | 
|  | effectTags = {OptionEffectTag.NO_OP}, | 
|  | defaultValue = "defaultValue" | 
|  | ) | 
|  | public String flag2; | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | @Test | 
|  | public void testOldNameToCanonicalNameConflict() { | 
|  | ConstructionException expected = | 
|  | assertThrows( | 
|  | "old_name should conflict with the flag already named old_name", | 
|  | ConstructionException.class, | 
|  | () -> construct(OldNameToCanonicalNameConflictExample.class)); | 
|  | assertThat(expected).hasCauseThat().isInstanceOf(DuplicateOptionDeclarationException.class); | 
|  | assertThat(expected) | 
|  | .hasMessageThat() | 
|  | .contains( | 
|  | "Duplicate option name, due to option name collision with another option's old name:" | 
|  | + " --old_name"); | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | /** Dummy options class. */ | 
|  | public static class OldNameConflictExample extends OptionsBase { | 
|  | @Option( | 
|  | name = "new_name", | 
|  | oldName = "old_name", | 
|  | documentationCategory = OptionDocumentationCategory.UNCATEGORIZED, | 
|  | effectTags = {OptionEffectTag.NO_OP}, | 
|  | defaultValue = "defaultValue" | 
|  | ) | 
|  | public String flag1; | 
|  |  | 
|  | @Option( | 
|  | name = "another_name", | 
|  | oldName = "old_name", | 
|  | documentationCategory = OptionDocumentationCategory.UNCATEGORIZED, | 
|  | effectTags = {OptionEffectTag.NO_OP}, | 
|  | defaultValue = "defaultValue" | 
|  | ) | 
|  | public String flag2; | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | @Test | 
|  | public void testOldNameToOldNameConflict() { | 
|  | ConstructionException expected = | 
|  | assertThrows( | 
|  | "old_name should conflict with the flag already named old_name", | 
|  | ConstructionException.class, | 
|  | () -> construct(OldNameConflictExample.class)); | 
|  | assertThat(expected).hasCauseThat().isInstanceOf(DuplicateOptionDeclarationException.class); | 
|  | assertThat(expected) | 
|  | .hasMessageThat() | 
|  | .contains( | 
|  | "Duplicate option name, due to old option name collision with another " | 
|  | + "old option name: --old_name"); | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | /** Dummy options class. */ | 
|  | public static class StringConverter implements Converter<String> { | 
|  | @Override | 
|  | public String convert(String input) { | 
|  | return input; | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | @Override | 
|  | public String getTypeDescription() { | 
|  | return "a string"; | 
|  | } | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | /** | 
|  | * Dummy options class. | 
|  | * | 
|  | * <p>Option name order is different from field name order. | 
|  | * | 
|  | * <p>There are four fields to increase the likelihood of a non-deterministic order being noticed. | 
|  | */ | 
|  | public static class FieldNamesDifferOptions extends OptionsBase { | 
|  |  | 
|  | @Option( | 
|  | name = "foo", | 
|  | documentationCategory = OptionDocumentationCategory.UNCATEGORIZED, | 
|  | effectTags = {OptionEffectTag.NO_OP}, | 
|  | defaultValue = "0" | 
|  | ) | 
|  | public int aFoo; | 
|  |  | 
|  | @Option( | 
|  | name = "bar", | 
|  | documentationCategory = OptionDocumentationCategory.UNCATEGORIZED, | 
|  | effectTags = {OptionEffectTag.NO_OP}, | 
|  | defaultValue = "0" | 
|  | ) | 
|  | public int bBar; | 
|  |  | 
|  | @Option( | 
|  | name = "baz", | 
|  | documentationCategory = OptionDocumentationCategory.UNCATEGORIZED, | 
|  | effectTags = {OptionEffectTag.NO_OP}, | 
|  | defaultValue = "0" | 
|  | ) | 
|  | public int cBaz; | 
|  |  | 
|  | @Option( | 
|  | name = "qux", | 
|  | documentationCategory = OptionDocumentationCategory.UNCATEGORIZED, | 
|  | effectTags = {OptionEffectTag.NO_OP}, | 
|  | defaultValue = "0" | 
|  | ) | 
|  | public int dQux; | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | /** Dummy options class. */ | 
|  | public static class EndOfAlphabetOptions extends OptionsBase { | 
|  | @Option( | 
|  | name = "X", | 
|  | documentationCategory = OptionDocumentationCategory.UNCATEGORIZED, | 
|  | effectTags = {OptionEffectTag.NO_OP}, | 
|  | defaultValue = "0" | 
|  | ) | 
|  | public int x; | 
|  |  | 
|  | @Option( | 
|  | name = "Y", | 
|  | documentationCategory = OptionDocumentationCategory.UNCATEGORIZED, | 
|  | effectTags = {OptionEffectTag.NO_OP}, | 
|  | defaultValue = "0" | 
|  | ) | 
|  | public int y; | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | /** Dummy options class. */ | 
|  | public static class ReverseOrderedOptions extends OptionsBase { | 
|  | @Option( | 
|  | name = "C", | 
|  | documentationCategory = OptionDocumentationCategory.UNCATEGORIZED, | 
|  | effectTags = {OptionEffectTag.NO_OP}, | 
|  | defaultValue = "0" | 
|  | ) | 
|  | public int c; | 
|  |  | 
|  | @Option( | 
|  | name = "B", | 
|  | documentationCategory = OptionDocumentationCategory.UNCATEGORIZED, | 
|  | effectTags = {OptionEffectTag.NO_OP}, | 
|  | defaultValue = "0" | 
|  | ) | 
|  | public int b; | 
|  |  | 
|  | @Option( | 
|  | name = "A", | 
|  | documentationCategory = OptionDocumentationCategory.UNCATEGORIZED, | 
|  | effectTags = {OptionEffectTag.NO_OP}, | 
|  | defaultValue = "0" | 
|  | ) | 
|  | public int a; | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | @Test | 
|  | public void optionsClassesIsOrdered() throws Exception { | 
|  | IsolatedOptionsData data = construct( | 
|  | FieldNamesDifferOptions.class, | 
|  | EndOfAlphabetOptions.class, | 
|  | ReverseOrderedOptions.class); | 
|  | assertThat(data.getOptionsClasses()).containsExactly( | 
|  | FieldNamesDifferOptions.class, | 
|  | EndOfAlphabetOptions.class, | 
|  | ReverseOrderedOptions.class).inOrder(); | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | @Test | 
|  | public void getAllNamedFieldsIsOrdered() throws Exception { | 
|  | IsolatedOptionsData data = construct( | 
|  | FieldNamesDifferOptions.class, | 
|  | EndOfAlphabetOptions.class, | 
|  | ReverseOrderedOptions.class); | 
|  | ArrayList<String> names = new ArrayList<>(); | 
|  | for (Map.Entry<String, OptionDefinition> entry : data.getAllOptionDefinitions()) { | 
|  | names.add(entry.getKey()); | 
|  | } | 
|  | assertThat(names).containsExactly( | 
|  | "bar", "baz", "foo", "qux", "X", "Y", "A", "B", "C").inOrder(); | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | private List<String> getOptionNames(Class<? extends OptionsBase> optionsBase) { | 
|  | ArrayList<String> result = new ArrayList<>(); | 
|  | for (OptionDefinition optionDefinition : | 
|  | OptionsData.getAllOptionDefinitionsForClass(optionsBase)) { | 
|  | result.add(optionDefinition.getOptionName()); | 
|  | } | 
|  | return result; | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | @Test | 
|  | public void getFieldsForClassIsOrdered() throws Exception { | 
|  | assertThat(getOptionNames(FieldNamesDifferOptions.class)) | 
|  | .containsExactly("bar", "baz", "foo", "qux") | 
|  | .inOrder(); | 
|  | assertThat(getOptionNames(EndOfAlphabetOptions.class)).containsExactly("X", "Y").inOrder(); | 
|  | assertThat(getOptionNames(ReverseOrderedOptions.class)) | 
|  | .containsExactly("A", "B", "C") | 
|  | .inOrder(); | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | @Test | 
|  | public void optionsDefinitionsAreSharedBetweenOptionsBases() throws Exception { | 
|  | Class<FieldNamesDifferOptions> class1 = FieldNamesDifferOptions.class; | 
|  | Class<EndOfAlphabetOptions> class2 = EndOfAlphabetOptions.class; | 
|  | Class<ReverseOrderedOptions> class3 = ReverseOrderedOptions.class; | 
|  |  | 
|  | // Construct the definitions once and accumulate them so we can test that these are not | 
|  | // recomputed during the construction of the options data. | 
|  | ImmutableList<OptionDefinition> optionDefinitions = | 
|  | new ImmutableList.Builder<OptionDefinition>() | 
|  | .addAll(OptionsData.getAllOptionDefinitionsForClass(class1)) | 
|  | .addAll(OptionsData.getAllOptionDefinitionsForClass(class2)) | 
|  | .addAll(OptionsData.getAllOptionDefinitionsForClass(class3)) | 
|  | .build(); | 
|  |  | 
|  | // Construct the data all together. | 
|  | IsolatedOptionsData data = construct(class1, class2, class3); | 
|  | ArrayList<OptionDefinition> optionDefinitionsFromData = | 
|  | new ArrayList<>(optionDefinitions.size()); | 
|  | data.getAllOptionDefinitions() | 
|  | .forEach(entry -> optionDefinitionsFromData.add(entry.getValue())); | 
|  |  | 
|  | Correspondence<Object, Object> referenceEquality = | 
|  | Correspondence.from((obj1, obj2) -> obj1 == obj2, "is the same object as"); | 
|  | assertThat(optionDefinitionsFromData) | 
|  | .comparingElementsUsing(referenceEquality) | 
|  | .containsAtLeastElementsIn(optionDefinitions); | 
|  |  | 
|  | // Construct options data for each class separately, and check again. | 
|  | IsolatedOptionsData data1 = construct(class1); | 
|  | IsolatedOptionsData data2 = construct(class2); | 
|  | IsolatedOptionsData data3 = construct(class3); | 
|  | ArrayList<OptionDefinition> optionDefinitionsFromGroupedData = | 
|  | new ArrayList<>(optionDefinitions.size()); | 
|  | data1 | 
|  | .getAllOptionDefinitions() | 
|  | .forEach(entry -> optionDefinitionsFromGroupedData.add(entry.getValue())); | 
|  | data2 | 
|  | .getAllOptionDefinitions() | 
|  | .forEach(entry -> optionDefinitionsFromGroupedData.add(entry.getValue())); | 
|  | data3 | 
|  | .getAllOptionDefinitions() | 
|  | .forEach(entry -> optionDefinitionsFromGroupedData.add(entry.getValue())); | 
|  |  | 
|  | assertThat(optionDefinitionsFromGroupedData) | 
|  | .comparingElementsUsing(referenceEquality) | 
|  | .containsAtLeastElementsIn(optionDefinitions); | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | /** Dummy options class. */ | 
|  | public static class ValidExpansionOptions extends OptionsBase { | 
|  | @Option( | 
|  | name = "foo", | 
|  | documentationCategory = OptionDocumentationCategory.UNCATEGORIZED, | 
|  | effectTags = {OptionEffectTag.NO_OP}, | 
|  | defaultValue = "1" | 
|  | ) | 
|  | public int foo; | 
|  |  | 
|  | @Option( | 
|  | name = "bar", | 
|  | documentationCategory = OptionDocumentationCategory.UNCATEGORIZED, | 
|  | effectTags = {OptionEffectTag.NO_OP}, | 
|  | defaultValue = "null", | 
|  | expansion = {"--foo=42"} | 
|  | ) | 
|  | public Void bar; | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | @Test | 
|  | public void staticExpansionOptionsCanBeVoidType() { | 
|  | construct(ValidExpansionOptions.class); | 
|  | } | 
|  | } |