| // Copyright 2015 The Bazel Authors. All rights reserved. | |
| // | |
| // Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); | |
| // you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. | |
| // You may obtain a copy of the License at | |
| // | |
| // http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 | |
| // | |
| // Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software | |
| // distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, | |
| // WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. | |
| // See the License for the specific language governing permissions and | |
| // limitations under the License. | |
| package com.google.devtools.build.lib.analysis; | |
| import static com.google.common.truth.Truth.assertThat; | |
| import static com.google.devtools.build.lib.testutil.MoreAsserts.assertThrows; | |
| import com.google.common.collect.Iterables; | |
| import com.google.devtools.build.lib.actions.Artifact; | |
| import com.google.devtools.build.lib.actions.util.ActionsTestUtil; | |
| import com.google.devtools.build.lib.actions.util.ActionsTestUtil.UncheckedActionConflictException; | |
| import com.google.devtools.build.lib.analysis.config.BuildConfiguration; | |
| import com.google.devtools.build.lib.analysis.util.AnalysisTestUtil; | |
| import com.google.devtools.build.lib.analysis.util.BuildViewTestCase; | |
| import com.google.devtools.build.lib.rules.cpp.CcToolchainProvider; | |
| import com.google.devtools.build.lib.rules.cpp.CppHelper; | |
| import com.google.devtools.build.lib.skyframe.ConfiguredTargetAndData; | |
| import java.io.IOException; | |
| import java.util.List; | |
| import org.junit.Before; | |
| import org.junit.Test; | |
| import org.junit.runner.RunWith; | |
| import org.junit.runners.JUnit4; | |
| /** Unit tests for the {@link CompilationHelper} class. */ | |
| @RunWith(JUnit4.class) | |
| public class CompilationHelperTest extends BuildViewTestCase { | |
| private AnalysisTestUtil.CollectingAnalysisEnvironment analysisEnvironment; | |
| @Before | |
| public final void createAnalysisEnvironment() throws Exception { | |
| analysisEnvironment = | |
| new AnalysisTestUtil.CollectingAnalysisEnvironment(getTestAnalysisEnvironment()); | |
| } | |
| private List<Artifact> getAggregatingMiddleman( | |
| ConfiguredTarget rule, BuildConfiguration configuration, boolean withSolib) throws Exception { | |
| RuleContext ruleContext = getRuleContext(rule, analysisEnvironment); | |
| CcToolchainProvider toolchain = | |
| CppHelper.getToolchainUsingDefaultCcToolchainAttribute(ruleContext); | |
| return CppHelper.getAggregatingMiddlemanForTesting( | |
| ruleContext, | |
| ActionsTestUtil.NULL_ACTION_OWNER, | |
| "middleman", | |
| rule.getProvider(FileProvider.class).getFilesToBuild(), | |
| withSolib, | |
| toolchain.getSolibDirectory(), | |
| configuration); | |
| } | |
| private List<Artifact> getAggregatingMiddleman(ConfiguredTargetAndData rule, boolean withSolib) | |
| throws Exception { | |
| return getAggregatingMiddleman(rule.getConfiguredTarget(), rule.getConfiguration(), withSolib); | |
| } | |
| /** | |
| * Tests that duplicate calls to | |
| * {@link com.google.devtools.build.lib.analysis.CompilationHelper#getAggregatingMiddleman} | |
| * with identical parameters return the same artifact. | |
| */ | |
| @Test | |
| public void testDuplicateCallsReturnSameObject() throws Exception { | |
| ConfiguredTargetAndData rule = | |
| scratchConfiguredTargetAndData( | |
| "package", "a", "cc_binary(name = 'a'," + " srcs = ['a.cc'])"); | |
| List<Artifact> middleman1 = getAggregatingMiddleman(rule, false); | |
| assertThat(middleman1).hasSize(1); | |
| List<Artifact> middleman2 = getAggregatingMiddleman(rule, false); | |
| assertThat(middleman2).hasSize(1); | |
| assertThat(middleman2.get(0)).isEqualTo(middleman1.get(0)); | |
| } | |
| /** | |
| * Tests that | |
| * {@link com.google.devtools.build.lib.analysis.CompilationHelper#getAggregatingMiddleman} | |
| * returns distinct artifacts even when called with identical rules, depending on | |
| * whether solib symlink are created. | |
| */ | |
| @Test | |
| public void testMiddlemanAndSolibMiddlemanAreDistinct() throws Exception { | |
| ConfiguredTargetAndData rule = | |
| scratchConfiguredTargetAndData( | |
| "package", "liba.so", "cc_binary(name = 'liba.so', srcs = ['a.cc'], linkshared = 1)"); | |
| List<Artifact> middleman = getAggregatingMiddleman(rule, false); | |
| assertThat(middleman).hasSize(1); | |
| List<Artifact> middlemanWithSymlinks = getAggregatingMiddleman(rule, true); | |
| assertThat(middlemanWithSymlinks).hasSize(1); | |
| assertThat(middlemanWithSymlinks.get(0)).isNotSameInstanceAs(middleman.get(0)); | |
| } | |
| /** | |
| * Regression test: tests that Python CPU configurations are taken into account | |
| * when generating a rule's aggregating middleman, so that otherwise equivalent rules can sustain | |
| * distinct middlemen. | |
| */ | |
| @Test | |
| public void testPythonCcConfigurations() throws Exception { | |
| setupJavaPythonCcConfigurationFiles(); | |
| // Equivalent cc / Python configurations: | |
| ConfiguredTargetAndData ccRuleA = getConfiguredTargetAndData("//foo:liba.so"); | |
| List<Artifact> middleman1 = getAggregatingMiddleman(ccRuleA, true); | |
| ConfiguredTargetAndData ccRuleB = getConfiguredTargetAndData("//foo:libb.so"); | |
| getAggregatingMiddleman(ccRuleB, true); | |
| assertThrows( | |
| UncheckedActionConflictException.class, | |
| () -> analysisEnvironment.registerWith(getMutableActionGraph())); | |
| // This should succeed because the py_binary's middleman is under the Python configuration's | |
| // internal directory, while the cc_binary's middleman is under the cc config's directory, | |
| // and both configurations are the same. | |
| ConfiguredTargetAndData pyRuleB = | |
| getConfiguredTargetAndDataDirectPrerequisite( | |
| getConfiguredTargetAndData("//foo:c"), "//foo:libb.so"); | |
| List<Artifact> middleman2 = getAggregatingMiddleman(pyRuleB, true); | |
| assertThat(Iterables.getOnlyElement(middleman2).getExecPathString()) | |
| .isEqualTo(Iterables.getOnlyElement(middleman1).getExecPathString()); | |
| } | |
| /** | |
| * Regression test: tests that Java CPU configurations are taken into account when | |
| * generating a rule's aggregating middleman, so that otherwise equivalent rules can sustain | |
| * distinct middlemen. | |
| */ | |
| @Test | |
| public void testJavaCcConfigurations() throws Exception { | |
| setupJavaPythonCcConfigurationFiles(); | |
| // Equivalent cc / Java configurations: | |
| ConfiguredTargetAndData ccRuleA = getConfiguredTargetAndData("//foo:liba.so"); | |
| List<Artifact> middleman1 = getAggregatingMiddleman(ccRuleA, true); | |
| ConfiguredTargetAndData ccRuleB = getConfiguredTargetAndData("//foo:libb.so"); | |
| getAggregatingMiddleman(ccRuleB, true); | |
| assertThrows( | |
| UncheckedActionConflictException.class, | |
| () -> analysisEnvironment.registerWith(getMutableActionGraph())); | |
| // This should succeed because the java_binary's middleman is under the Java configuration's | |
| // internal directory, while the cc_binary's middleman is under the cc config's directory. | |
| ConfiguredTargetAndData javaRuleB = | |
| getConfiguredTargetAndDataDirectPrerequisite( | |
| getConfiguredTargetAndData("//foo:d"), "//foo:libb.so"); | |
| List<Artifact> middleman2 = getAggregatingMiddleman(javaRuleB, false); | |
| assertThat( | |
| Iterables.getOnlyElement(middleman1) | |
| .getExecPathString() | |
| .equals(Iterables.getOnlyElement(middleman2).getExecPathString())) | |
| .isFalse(); | |
| } | |
| private void setupJavaPythonCcConfigurationFiles() throws IOException { | |
| scratch.file( | |
| "foo/BUILD", | |
| "cc_binary(name = 'liba.so',", | |
| " linkshared = 1,", | |
| " srcs = ['a.cc'])", | |
| "cc_binary(name = 'libb.so',", | |
| " linkshared = 1,", | |
| " srcs = ['b.cc'])", | |
| "py_binary(name = 'c',", | |
| " data = [':libb.so'],", | |
| " srcs = ['c.py'])", | |
| "java_binary(name = 'd',", | |
| " srcs = ['d.java'],", | |
| " data = [':libb.so'],", | |
| " main_class = 'd')"); | |
| } | |
| } |