blob: 45a7163f78ef4aa9b41e7e6c19bc18fbf7a6da8d [file] [log] [blame]
// Copyright 2014 The Bazel Authors. All rights reserved.
//
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
// you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
// You may obtain a copy of the License at
//
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
//
// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
// limitations under the License.
package com.google.devtools.build.lib.rules.config;
import static com.google.devtools.build.lib.packages.Attribute.attr;
import static com.google.devtools.build.lib.packages.BuildType.LABEL_KEYED_STRING_DICT;
import static com.google.devtools.build.lib.packages.BuildType.LABEL_LIST;
import static com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Type.STRING;
import static com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Type.STRING_DICT;
import static com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Type.STRING_LIST;
import com.google.common.collect.ImmutableList;
import com.google.devtools.build.lib.analysis.BaseRuleClasses;
import com.google.devtools.build.lib.analysis.PlatformConfiguration;
import com.google.devtools.build.lib.analysis.RuleContext;
import com.google.devtools.build.lib.analysis.RuleDefinition;
import com.google.devtools.build.lib.analysis.RuleDefinitionEnvironment;
import com.google.devtools.build.lib.cmdline.Label;
import com.google.devtools.build.lib.packages.Attribute.LabelListLateBoundDefault;
import com.google.devtools.build.lib.packages.AttributeMap;
import com.google.devtools.build.lib.packages.NonconfigurableAttributeMapper;
import com.google.devtools.build.lib.packages.RuleClass;
import com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Type;
import java.util.List;
/**
* Definitions for rule classes that specify or manipulate configuration settings.
*
* <p>These are not "traditional" rule classes in that they can't be requested as top-level
* targets and don't translate input artifacts into output artifacts. Instead, they affect
* how *other* rules work. See individual class comments for details.
*/
public class ConfigRuleClasses {
private static final String NONCONFIGURABLE_ATTRIBUTE_REASON =
"part of a rule class that *triggers* configurable behavior";
/**
* Common settings for all configurability rules.
*/
public static final class ConfigBaseRule implements RuleDefinition {
@Override
public RuleClass build(RuleClass.Builder builder, RuleDefinitionEnvironment env) {
return builder
.override(attr("tags", Type.STRING_LIST)
// No need to show up in ":all", etc. target patterns.
.value(ImmutableList.of("manual"))
.nonconfigurable(NONCONFIGURABLE_ATTRIBUTE_REASON))
.exemptFromConstraintChecking(
"these rules don't include content that gets built into their dependers")
.build();
}
@Override
public Metadata getMetadata() {
return RuleDefinition.Metadata.builder()
.name("$config_base_rule")
.type(RuleClass.Builder.RuleClassType.ABSTRACT)
.ancestors(BaseRuleClasses.BaseRule.class)
.build();
}
}
/**
* A named "partial configuration setting" that specifies a set of command-line
* "flag=value" bindings.
*
* <p>For example:
* <pre>
* config_setting(
* name = 'foo',
* values = {
* 'flag1': 'aValue'
* 'flag2': 'bValue'
* })
* </pre>
*
* <p>declares a setting that binds command-line flag <pre>flag1</pre> to value
* <pre>aValue</pre> and <pre>flag2</pre> to <pre>bValue</pre>.
*
* <p>This is used by configurable attributes to determine which branch to
* follow based on which <pre>config_setting</pre> instance matches all its
* flag values in the configurable attribute owner's configuration.
*
* <p>This rule isn't accessed through the standard {@link RuleContext#getPrerequisites}
* interface. This is because Bazel constructs a rule's configured attribute map *before*
* its {@link RuleContext} is created (in fact, the map is an input to the context's
* constructor). And the config_settings referenced by the rule's configurable attributes are
* themselves inputs to that map. So Bazel has special logic to read and properly apply
* config_setting instances. See {@link ConfiguredTargetFunction#getConfigConditions} for details.
*/
public static final class ConfigSettingRule implements RuleDefinition {
/**
* The name of this rule.
*/
public static final String RULE_NAME = "config_setting";
/** The name of the attribute that declares flag bindings. */
public static final String SETTINGS_ATTRIBUTE = "values";
/** The name of the attribute that declares "--define foo=bar" flag bindings.*/
public static final String DEFINE_SETTINGS_ATTRIBUTE = "define_values";
/** The name of the attribute that declares user-defined flag bindings. */
public static final String FLAG_SETTINGS_ATTRIBUTE = "flag_values";
/** The name of the attribute that declares constraint_values. */
public static final String CONSTRAINT_VALUES_ATTRIBUTE = "constraint_values";
/** The name of the late bound attribute that declares the target platforms list. */
public static final String TARGET_PLATFORMS_ATTRIBUTE = ":target_platforms";
/** Implementation for the :target_platform attribute. */
public static final LabelListLateBoundDefault<?> TARGET_PLATFORMS =
LabelListLateBoundDefault.fromTargetConfiguration(
PlatformConfiguration.class,
(rule, attributes, platformConfig) ->
ConfigSettingRule.getTargetPlatformsIfRelevant(attributes, platformConfig));
private static ImmutableList<Label> getTargetPlatformsIfRelevant(
AttributeMap attributes, PlatformConfiguration platformConfig) {
List<Label> constraintValues = attributes.get(CONSTRAINT_VALUES_ATTRIBUTE, LABEL_LIST);
if (constraintValues == null || constraintValues.isEmpty()) {
return ImmutableList.of();
} else {
return platformConfig.getTargetPlatforms();
}
}
@Override
public RuleClass build(RuleClass.Builder builder, RuleDefinitionEnvironment env) {
return builder
/* <!-- #BLAZE_RULE(config_setting).ATTRIBUTE(values) -->
The set of configuration values that match this rule (expressed as Blaze flags)
<i>(Dictionary mapping flags to expected values, both expressed as strings;
mandatory)</i>
<p>This rule inherits the configuration of the configured target that
references it in a <code>select</code> statement. It is considered to
"match" a Blaze invocation if, for every entry in the dictionary, its
configuration matches the entry's expected value. For example
<code>values = {"compilation_mode": "opt"}</code> matches the invocations
<code>blaze build --compilation_mode=opt ...</code> and
<code>blaze build -c opt ...</code> on target-configured rules.
</p>
<p>For convenience's sake, configuration values are specified as Blaze flags (without
the preceding <code>"--"</code>). But keep in mind that the two are not the same. This
is because targets can be built in multiple configurations within the same
build. For example, a host configuration's "cpu" matches the value of
<code>--host_cpu</code>, not <code>--cpu</code>. So different instances of the
same <code>config_setting</code> may match the same invocation differently
depending on the configuration of the rule using them.
</p>
<p>If a flag is not explicitly set at the command line, its default value is used.
If a key appears multiple times in the dictionary, only the last instance is used.
If a key references a flag that can be set multiple times on the command line (e.g.
<code>blaze build --copt=foo --copt=bar --copt=baz ...</code>), a match occurs if
<i>any</i> of those settings match.
<p>
<p>This and <a href="${link config_setting.define_values}"><code>define_values</code></a>
cannot both be empty.
</p>
<!-- #END_BLAZE_RULE.ATTRIBUTE --> */
.add(
attr(SETTINGS_ATTRIBUTE, STRING_DICT)
.nonconfigurable(NONCONFIGURABLE_ATTRIBUTE_REASON))
/* <!-- #BLAZE_RULE(config_setting).ATTRIBUTE(define_values) -->
The same as <a href="${link config_setting.values}"><code>values</code></a> but
specifically for the <code>--define</code> flag.
<p><code>--define</code> is special for two reasons:
<ol>
<li>It's the primary interface Blaze has today for declaring user-definable settings.
</li>
<li>Its syntax (<code>--define KEY=VAL</code>) means <code>KEY=VAL</code> is
a <i>value</i> from a Blaze flag perspective.</li>
</ol>
<p>That means:
<pre class="code">
config_setting(
name = "a_and_b",
values = {
"define": "a=1",
"define": "b=2",
})
</pre>
<p>doesn't work because the same key (<code>define</code>) appears twice in the
dictionary. This attribute solves that problem:
<pre class="code">
config_setting(
name = "a_and_b",
define_values = {
"a": "1",
"b": "2",
})
</pre>
<p>corrrectly matches <code>blaze build //foo --define a=1 --define b=2</code>.
<p><code>--define</code> can still appear in
<a href="${link config_setting.values}"><code>values</code></a> with normal flag syntax,
and can be mixed freely with this attribute as long as dictionary keys remain distinct.
<!-- #END_BLAZE_RULE.ATTRIBUTE --> */
.add(
attr(DEFINE_SETTINGS_ATTRIBUTE, STRING_DICT)
.nonconfigurable(NONCONFIGURABLE_ATTRIBUTE_REASON))
.add(
attr(FLAG_SETTINGS_ATTRIBUTE, LABEL_KEYED_STRING_DICT)
.undocumented("the feature flag feature has not yet been launched")
.allowedFileTypes()
.mandatoryProviders(ImmutableList.of(ConfigFeatureFlagProvider.id()))
.nonconfigurable(NONCONFIGURABLE_ATTRIBUTE_REASON))
/* <!-- #BLAZE_RULE(config_setting).ATTRIBUTE(constraint_values) -->
The set of <code>constraint_values</code> that match this rule.
<p>A <a href="platform.html#constraint_value">constraint_value</a> is composed of a name
and a corresponding <a href="platform.html#constraint_setting">constraint_setting</a>
which classifies the value. A <a href=""platform.html#platform>platform</a> consists of a
collection of <code>constraint_value</code> labels which describes target itself and/or
how its environment.
</p>
<pre class="code">
constraint_setting(name = "rock_type")
constraint_value(name = metamorphic, constraint_setting = "rock_type")
platform(
name = "my_platform_rocks",
constraint_values = [":metamorphic"]
)
</pre>
<p>As mentioned above, this rule inherits the configuration of the configured target that
references it in a <code>select</code> statement. This <code>constraint_values</code>
attribute is considered to "match" a Blaze invocation if it includes each
<code>constraint_value</code> specified in the configuration's target platform which is
set with the command line flag <code>--experimental_platforms</code>. If it contains
extra <code>constraint_values</code> not included in the target platform, it is still
considered a match. In this example, both <code>slate</code> and
<code>marble</code> would be considered matches for a blaze invocation which
uses <code>--experimental_platforms=my_platform_rocks</code>. Multiple matches like this
may lead to ambiguous select resolves and are not allowed.
</p>
<pre class = "code">
constraint_setting(name = "color")
constraint_value(name = "white", constraint_setting = "color")
config_setting(
name = "slate",
constraint_values = [":metamorphic"]
)
config_setting(
name = "marble",
constraint_values = [
":metamorphic",
":white"
]
)
</pre>
<!-- #END_BLAZE_RULE.ATTRIBUTE --> */
.add(
attr(CONSTRAINT_VALUES_ATTRIBUTE, LABEL_LIST)
.nonconfigurable(NONCONFIGURABLE_ATTRIBUTE_REASON)
.allowedFileTypes())
.add(
attr(TARGET_PLATFORMS_ATTRIBUTE, LABEL_LIST)
.value(TARGET_PLATFORMS)
.nonconfigurable(NONCONFIGURABLE_ATTRIBUTE_REASON))
.setIsConfigMatcherForConfigSettingOnly()
.setOptionReferenceFunctionForConfigSettingOnly(
rule ->
NonconfigurableAttributeMapper.of(rule)
.get(SETTINGS_ATTRIBUTE, Type.STRING_DICT)
.keySet())
.build();
}
@Override
public Metadata getMetadata() {
return RuleDefinition.Metadata.builder()
.name(RULE_NAME)
.type(RuleClass.Builder.RuleClassType.NORMAL)
.ancestors(ConfigBaseRule.class)
.factoryClass(ConfigSetting.class)
.build();
}
}
/*<!-- #BLAZE_RULE (NAME = config_setting, TYPE = OTHER, FAMILY = General)[GENERIC_RULE] -->
<p>
Matches an expected configuration state (expressed as Blaze flags) for the purpose of triggering
configurable attributes. See <a href="${link select}">select</a> for how to consume this
rule and <a href="${link common-definitions#configurable-attributes}">
Configurable attributes</a> for an overview of the general feature.
<h4 id="config_setting_examples">Examples</h4>
<p>The following matches any Blaze invocation that specifies <code>--compilation_mode=opt</code>
or <code>-c opt</code> (either explicitly at the command line or implicitly from .blazerc
files, etc.), when applied to a target configuration rule:
</p>
<pre class="code">
config_setting(
name = "simple",
values = {"compilation_mode": "opt"}
)
</pre>
<p>The following matches any Blaze invocation that builds for ARM and applies a custom define
(e.g. <code>blaze build --cpu=armeabi --define FOO=bar ...</code>), when applied to a target
configuration rule:
</p>
<pre class="code">
config_setting(
name = "two_conditions",
values = {
"cpu": "armeabi",
"define": "FOO=bar"
}
)
</pre>
<p>The following config_setting matches any Blaze invocation that builds a platform which contains
exactly the same or a subset of its constraint_values (like the example below).
</p>
<pre class=""code">
config_setting(
name = "marble",
constraint_values = [
"white",
"metamorphic",
]
)
platform(
name = "marble_platform",
constraint_values = [
"white",
"metamorphic"
]
)
</pre>
<h4 id="config_setting_notes">Notes</h4>
<p>See <a href="${link select}">select</a> for policies on what happens depending on how
many rules match an invocation.
</p>
<p>For flags that support shorthand forms (e.g. <code>--compilation_mode</code> vs.
<code>-c</code>), <code>values</code> definitions must use the full form. These automatically
match invocations using either form.
</p>
<p>The currently endorsed method for creating custom conditions that can't be expressed through
dedicated build flags is through the --define flag. Use this flag with caution: it's not ideal
and only endorsed for lack of a currently better workaround. See the
<a href="${link common-definitions#configurable-attributes}">
Configurable attributes</a> section for more discussion.
</p>
<p>Try to consolidate <code>config_setting</code> definitions as much as possible. In other words,
define <code>//common/conditions:foo</code> in one common package instead of repeating separate
instances in <code>//project1:foo</code>, <code>//project2:foo</code>, etc. that all mean the
same thing.
</p>
<p><a href="general.html#config_setting.values"><code>values</code></a>,
<a href="general.html#config_setting.define_values"><code>define_values</code></a>, and
<a href=general.html#config_setting.constraint_values"><code>constraint_values</code></a>
can be used in any combination in the same config_setting but at least one must be set for any
given config_setting.
</p>
<!-- #END_BLAZE_RULE -->*/
/** Rule definition for Android's config_feature_flag rule. */
public static final class ConfigFeatureFlagRule implements RuleDefinition {
@Override
public RuleClass build(RuleClass.Builder builder, RuleDefinitionEnvironment env) {
return builder
.setUndocumented(/* the feature flag feature has not yet been launched */)
.requiresConfigurationFragments(ConfigFeatureFlagConfiguration.class)
.add(
attr("allowed_values", STRING_LIST)
.mandatory()
.nonEmpty()
.orderIndependent()
.nonconfigurable(NONCONFIGURABLE_ATTRIBUTE_REASON))
.add(
attr("default_value", STRING)
.nonconfigurable(NONCONFIGURABLE_ATTRIBUTE_REASON))
.add(ConfigFeatureFlag.getWhitelistAttribute(env))
.build();
}
@Override
public RuleDefinition.Metadata getMetadata() {
return RuleDefinition.Metadata.builder()
.name("config_feature_flag")
.ancestors(ConfigBaseRule.class)
.factoryClass(ConfigFeatureFlag.class)
.build();
}
}
}