blob: 87bd0f7a84dca147461e4a210273006a574ee936 [file] [log] [blame]
Jakob Buchgraber2b49f672017-04-26 15:37:42 +02001// Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format
2// Copyright 2008 Google Inc. All rights reserved.
3// https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/
4//
5// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
6// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
7// met:
8//
9// * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
10// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
11// * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
12// copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer
13// in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
14// distribution.
15// * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its
16// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
17// this software without specific prior written permission.
18//
19// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
20// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
21// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
22// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
23// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
24// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
25// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
26// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
27// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
28// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
29// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
30
31// Author: benjy@google.com (Benjy Weinberger)
32// Based on original Protocol Buffers design by
33// Sanjay Ghemawat, Jeff Dean, and others.
34//
35// A proto file used to test the "custom options" feature of google.protobuf.
36
37// This file is based on unittest_custom_options.proto in
38// src/google/protobuf, but is modified for proto3. It could
39// potentially be moved into src/google/protobuf, but currently C#
40// is the only language that really needs it, as we don't support
41// proto2 syntax. It's cut down significantly as proto3 only supports
42// extensions for options.
43
44
45syntax = "proto3";
46
47// A custom file option (defined below).
48option (file_opt1) = 9876543210;
49
50import "google/protobuf/descriptor.proto";
51
52// We don't put this in a package within proto2 because we need to make sure
53// that the generated code doesn't depend on being in the proto2 namespace.
54package protobuf_unittest;
55option csharp_namespace = "UnitTest.Issues.TestProtos";
56
57// Some simple test custom options of various types.
58
59extend google.protobuf.FileOptions {
60 uint64 file_opt1 = 7736974;
61}
62
63extend google.protobuf.MessageOptions {
64 int32 message_opt1 = 7739036;
65}
66
67extend google.protobuf.FieldOptions {
68 fixed64 field_opt1 = 7740936;
69}
70
71extend google.protobuf.OneofOptions {
72 int32 oneof_opt1 = 7740111;
73}
74
75extend google.protobuf.EnumOptions {
76 sfixed32 enum_opt1 = 7753576;
77}
78
79extend google.protobuf.EnumValueOptions {
80 int32 enum_value_opt1 = 1560678;
81}
82
83extend google.protobuf.ServiceOptions {
84 sint64 service_opt1 = 7887650;
85}
86
87enum MethodOpt1 {
88 METHODOPT1_UNSPECIFIED = 0;
89 METHODOPT1_VAL1 = 1;
90 METHODOPT1_VAL2 = 2;
91}
92
93extend google.protobuf.MethodOptions {
94 MethodOpt1 method_opt1 = 7890860;
95}
96
97// A test message with custom options at all possible locations (and also some
98// regular options, to make sure they interact nicely).
99message TestMessageWithCustomOptions {
100 option message_set_wire_format = false;
101
102 option (message_opt1) = -56;
103
104 string field1 = 1 [ctype=CORD,
105 (field_opt1)=8765432109];
106
107 oneof AnOneof {
108 option (oneof_opt1) = -99;
109 int32 oneof_field = 2;
110 }
111
112 enum AnEnum {
113 option (enum_opt1) = -789;
114 ANENUM_UNSPECIFIED = 0;
115 ANENUM_VAL1 = 1;
116 ANENUM_VAL2 = 2 [(enum_value_opt1) = 123];
117 }
118}
119
120
121// A test RPC service with custom options at all possible locations (and also
122// some regular options, to make sure they interact nicely).
123message CustomOptionFooRequest {
124}
125
126message CustomOptionFooResponse {
127}
128
129message CustomOptionFooClientMessage {
130}
131
132message CustomOptionFooServerMessage {
133}
134
135service TestServiceWithCustomOptions {
136 option (service_opt1) = -9876543210;
137
138 rpc Foo(CustomOptionFooRequest) returns (CustomOptionFooResponse) {
139 option (method_opt1) = METHODOPT1_VAL2;
140 }
141}
142
143
144
145// Options of every possible field type, so we can test them all exhaustively.
146
147message DummyMessageContainingEnum {
148 enum TestEnumType {
149 TEST_OPTION_ENUM_UNSPECIFIED = 0;
150 TEST_OPTION_ENUM_TYPE1 = 22;
151 TEST_OPTION_ENUM_TYPE2 = -23;
152 }
153}
154
155message DummyMessageInvalidAsOptionType {
156}
157
158extend google.protobuf.MessageOptions {
159 bool bool_opt = 7706090;
160 int32 int32_opt = 7705709;
161 int64 int64_opt = 7705542;
162 uint32 uint32_opt = 7704880;
163 uint64 uint64_opt = 7702367;
164 sint32 sint32_opt = 7701568;
165 sint64 sint64_opt = 7700863;
166 fixed32 fixed32_opt = 7700307;
167 fixed64 fixed64_opt = 7700194;
168 sfixed32 sfixed32_opt = 7698645;
169 sfixed64 sfixed64_opt = 7685475;
170 float float_opt = 7675390;
171 double double_opt = 7673293;
172 string string_opt = 7673285;
173 bytes bytes_opt = 7673238;
174 DummyMessageContainingEnum.TestEnumType enum_opt = 7673233;
175 DummyMessageInvalidAsOptionType message_type_opt = 7665967;
176}
177
178message CustomOptionMinIntegerValues {
179 option (bool_opt) = false;
180 option (int32_opt) = -0x80000000;
181 option (int64_opt) = -0x8000000000000000;
182 option (uint32_opt) = 0;
183 option (uint64_opt) = 0;
184 option (sint32_opt) = -0x80000000;
185 option (sint64_opt) = -0x8000000000000000;
186 option (fixed32_opt) = 0;
187 option (fixed64_opt) = 0;
188 option (sfixed32_opt) = -0x80000000;
189 option (sfixed64_opt) = -0x8000000000000000;
190}
191
192message CustomOptionMaxIntegerValues {
193 option (bool_opt) = true;
194 option (int32_opt) = 0x7FFFFFFF;
195 option (int64_opt) = 0x7FFFFFFFFFFFFFFF;
196 option (uint32_opt) = 0xFFFFFFFF;
197 option (uint64_opt) = 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF;
198 option (sint32_opt) = 0x7FFFFFFF;
199 option (sint64_opt) = 0x7FFFFFFFFFFFFFFF;
200 option (fixed32_opt) = 0xFFFFFFFF;
201 option (fixed64_opt) = 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF;
202 option (sfixed32_opt) = 0x7FFFFFFF;
203 option (sfixed64_opt) = 0x7FFFFFFFFFFFFFFF;
204}
205
206message CustomOptionOtherValues {
207 option (int32_opt) = -100; // To test sign-extension.
208 option (float_opt) = 12.3456789;
209 option (double_opt) = 1.234567890123456789;
210 option (string_opt) = "Hello, \"World\"";
211 option (bytes_opt) = "Hello\0World";
212 option (enum_opt) = TEST_OPTION_ENUM_TYPE2;
213}
214
215message SettingRealsFromPositiveInts {
216 option (float_opt) = 12;
217 option (double_opt) = 154;
218}
219
220message SettingRealsFromNegativeInts {
221 option (float_opt) = -12;
222 option (double_opt) = -154;
223}
224
225// Options of complex message types, themselves combined and extended in
226// various ways.
227
228message ComplexOptionType1 {
229 int32 foo = 1;
230 int32 foo2 = 2;
231 int32 foo3 = 3;
232 repeated int32 foo4 = 4;
233}
234
235message ComplexOptionType2 {
236 ComplexOptionType1 bar = 1;
237 int32 baz = 2;
238
239 message ComplexOptionType4 {
240 int32 waldo = 1;
241
242 extend google.protobuf.MessageOptions {
243 ComplexOptionType4 complex_opt4 = 7633546;
244 }
245 }
246
247 ComplexOptionType4 fred = 3;
248 repeated ComplexOptionType4 barney = 4;
249}
250
251message ComplexOptionType3 {
252 int32 qux = 1;
253}
254
255extend google.protobuf.MessageOptions {
256 protobuf_unittest.ComplexOptionType1 complex_opt1 = 7646756;
257 ComplexOptionType2 complex_opt2 = 7636949;
258 ComplexOptionType3 complex_opt3 = 7636463;
259}
260
261// Note that we try various different ways of naming the same extension.
262message VariousComplexOptions {
263 option (.protobuf_unittest.complex_opt1).foo = 42;
264 option (protobuf_unittest.complex_opt1).foo4 = 99;
265 option (protobuf_unittest.complex_opt1).foo4 = 88;
266 option (complex_opt2).baz = 987;
267 option (complex_opt2).bar.foo = 743;
268 option (ComplexOptionType2.ComplexOptionType4.complex_opt4).waldo = 1971;
269 option (complex_opt2).fred.waldo = 321;
270 option (complex_opt2).barney = { waldo: 101 };
271 option (complex_opt2).barney = { waldo: 212 };
272 option (protobuf_unittest.complex_opt3).qux = 9;
273}
274
275// ------------------------------------------------------
276// Definitions for testing aggregate option parsing.
277// See descriptor_unittest.cc.
278
279// A helper type used to test aggregate option parsing
280message Aggregate {
281 int32 i = 1;
282 string s = 2;
283
284 // A nested object
285 Aggregate sub = 3;
286}
287
288// Allow Aggregate to be used as an option at all possible locations
289// in the .proto grammer.
290extend google.protobuf.FileOptions { Aggregate fileopt = 15478479; }
291extend google.protobuf.MessageOptions { Aggregate msgopt = 15480088; }
292extend google.protobuf.FieldOptions { Aggregate fieldopt = 15481374; }
293extend google.protobuf.EnumOptions { Aggregate enumopt = 15483218; }
294extend google.protobuf.EnumValueOptions { Aggregate enumvalopt = 15486921; }
295extend google.protobuf.ServiceOptions { Aggregate serviceopt = 15497145; }
296extend google.protobuf.MethodOptions { Aggregate methodopt = 15512713; }
297
298// Try using AggregateOption at different points in the proto grammar
299option (fileopt) = {
300 s: 'FileAnnotation'
301 // Also test the handling of comments
302 /* of both types */ i: 100
303
304 sub { s: 'NestedFileAnnotation' }
305};
306
307message AggregateMessage {
308 option (msgopt) = { i:101 s:'MessageAnnotation' };
309 int32 fieldname = 1 [(fieldopt) = { s:'FieldAnnotation' }];
310}
311
312service AggregateService {
313 option (serviceopt) = { s:'ServiceAnnotation' };
314 rpc Method (AggregateMessage) returns (AggregateMessage) {
315 option (methodopt) = { s:'MethodAnnotation' };
316 }
317}
318
319enum AggregateEnum {
320 option (enumopt) = { s:'EnumAnnotation' };
321 UNSPECIFIED = 0;
322 VALUE = 1 [(enumvalopt) = { s:'EnumValueAnnotation' }];
323}
324
325// Test custom options for nested type.
326message NestedOptionType {
327 message NestedMessage {
328 option (message_opt1) = 1001;
329 int32 nested_field = 1 [(field_opt1) = 1002];
330 }
331 enum NestedEnum {
332 UNSPECIFIED = 0;
333 option (enum_opt1) = 1003;
334 NESTED_ENUM_VALUE = 1 [(enum_value_opt1) = 1004];
335 }
336}